Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31311531›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Quality of primary care delivery and productive interactions among community-living frail older persons and their general practitioners and practice nurses.

Lotte Vestjens, Jane M Cramm, Anna P Nieboer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. A Bayesian Structural Equation Model to Predict Quality of Life in European Older Adults.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lotte VestjensErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR, The Netherlands. vestjens@eshpm.eur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4396-403X
Jane M CrammErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR, The Netherlands.
Anna P NieboerErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR, The Netherlands.

Funding

insurer CZ n.a.insurer VGZ n.a.Stichting Groenhuysen n.a.Stichting tanteLouise-Vivensis n.a.TWB Thuiszorg met Aandacht n.a.Zorggroep West-Brabant n.a.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough there is evidence with respect to the effectiveness of Chronic Care Model (CCM)-based programs in terms of improved patient outcomes, less attention has been given to the effect of high-quality care on productivity of patient-professional interactions, especially among frail older persons. The aim of our study was therefore to examine whether frail community-dwelling older persons' perspectives on quality of primary care according to the dimensions of the CCM are associated with the productivity of the patient-professional interactions.

methodsOur study was part of a large-scale evaluation study with a matched quasi-experimental design to compare outcomes of frail community-dwelling older persons that participated in a proactive, integrated primary care approach based on (elements of) the CCM and those that received usual primary care. Frail older persons' perceptions of quality of care were assessed with the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care Short version (PACIC-S). Productive interactions with general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses were assessed using a relational coproduction instrument. Measurements were performed at baseline (T0) and 12 months thereafter (T1). In total, 232 frail older persons were participating in the intervention group at T0 and matched to 232 frail older persons in the control group. At T1, 182 persons were in the intervention group and 176 in the control group.

resultsPaired sample t-tests showed significant improvements in overall quality of care, the majority of underlying quality of care items, and productive interactions within the intervention group and control group over time. Multilevel analyses revealed that productive interaction with the GP and practice nurse at T1 was significantly related to perceived productive interaction with them at T0, the perceived quality of primary care at T0, and the change in perceived quality of primary care over time (between T0 and T1).

conclusionsFrail community-dwelling older persons' perspectives on quality of primary care were associated with perceived productivity of their interactions with the GP and practice nurse in both the intervention group and the control group. We found no significant differences in overall perceived quality of care and perceived patient-professional interaction between the intervention group and control group at baseline and follow-up. In times of population aging it is necessary to invest in high-quality care delivery for frail older persons and productive interactions with them.

Indexed as

Nurse-Patient RelationsPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseFemaleFrail ElderlyGeneral PractitionersHealth Services ResearchHumansIndependent LivingMaleNursesChronic care modelElderlyFrailtyProductive patient-professional interactionsQuality of primary care

Identifiers

PMID31311531
PMCPMC6636169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.