ArticleBMC medical ethics2019
Experiences from a community advisory Board in the Implementation of early access to ART for all in Eswatini: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community engagement in research in sub-Saharan Africa: current practices, barriers, facilitators, ethical considerations and the role of gender - a systematic review.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Pooled it
- Implementing text-messaging to support and enhance delivery of health behavior change interventions in low- to middle-income countries: case study of the Lifestyle Africa intervention.BMC public health · 2023Trial
- Perceptions of ischaemic heart disease risk among Indian migrants in Australia: a qualitative study.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
- Engaging people with lived experience on community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Composing authorship teams for health equity: an introduction to the health equity research production model.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Advancing Sustainable HIV Services Through Integration in Primary Healthcare in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Perspective on Practical Recommendations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Transcreation and Feasibility of Spanish-Language Pediatric Post-Transplant Adherence App (BMT4me©): Insights from a Community Advisory Board Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Building a diverse national research advisory board.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Wrestling with Public Input on an Ethical Analysis of Scientific Research.The Hastings Center report · 2023Article
- Regulation of community advisory boards during conduct of clinical trials in Uganda: a qualitative study involving stakeholders.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Community input in a genomic health implementation program: Perspectives of a community advisory group.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Community advisory committee as a facilitator of health and wellbeing: A qualitative study in informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Capacity of community advisory boards for effective engagement in clinical research: a mixed methods study.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Correlates of attendance at community engagement meetings held in advance of bio-behavioral research studies: A longitudinal, sociocentric social network study in rural Uganda.PLoS medicine · 2021Article
- Community-structures that facilitate engagement in health research: Ifakara Health Research Institute-Bagamoyo case study.AAS open research · 2021Article
- Participant compensation in global health research: a case study.International health · 2020Article
- Integrating and Interpreting Findings from the Latest Treatment as Prevention Trials.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2020Review
- Researching Multisystemic Resilience: A Sample Methodology.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Community engagement and building trust to resolve ethical challenges during humanitarian crises: experience from the CAGED study.Conflict and health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEngaging communities in community-based health research is increasingly being adopted in low- and middle-income countries. The use of community advisory boards (CABs) is one method of practicing community involvement in health research. To date, few studies provide in-depth accounts of the strategies that CAB members use to practice community engagement. We assessed the perspectives, experiences and practices of the first local CAB in Eswatini (formerly known as Swaziland), which was implemented as part of the MaxART Early Access to ART for All study.
methodsTrained Swazi research assistants conducted two focus group discussions and 13 semi-structured interviews with CAB members who had been part of the MaxART study for at least 2.5 years. Interviews explored CAB composition and recruitment, the activities of CAB members, the mechanisms used to engage with communities and the challenges they faced in their role.
resultsThe MaxART CAB played an active role in the implementation of the Early Access to Art for All study, and activities mainly focused on: (1) promoting ethical conduct, in particular privacy, consent and confidentiality; (2) communication and education, communicating about the study and educating the community on the benefits of HIV testing and early access to HIV treatment; and (3) liaising between the community and the research team. Strategies for interacting with communities were varied and included attending general community meetings, visiting health facilities and visiting public places such as cattle dipping tanks, buses, bars and churches. Differences in the approach to community engagement between CAB members living in the study areas and those residing outside were identified.
conclusionThe experiences of the first CAB in Eswatini demonstrate that community engagement using CABs is a valuable mechanism for engaging communities in implementation studies. Considerations that could impact CAB functioning include clearly defining the scope of the CAB, addressing issues of CAB independence, the CAB budget, providing emotional support for CAB members, and providing continuous training and capacity building. These issues should be addressed during the early stages of CAB formation in order to optimize functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.