Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31311526›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2019

Experiences from a community advisory Board in the Implementation of early access to ART for all in Eswatini: a qualitative study.

Charmaine Khudzie Mlambo, Eva Vernooij, Roos Geut, Eliane Vrolings, Buyisile Shongwe, Saima Jiwan, Yvette Fleming, Gavin Khumalo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Building a diverse national research advisory board.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Charmaine Khudzie MlamboClinton Health Access Initiative, Mbabane, Swaziland. khudzie@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9265-6039
Eva VernooijDepartment of Anthropology, Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Roos GeutDepartment of Anthropology, Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eliane VrolingsAidsfonds, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Buyisile ShongweSwaziland National Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS, Mbabane, Swaziland.
Saima JiwanGlobal Network of People Living with HIV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Yvette FlemingAidsfonds, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gavin KhumaloSwaziland National Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS, Mbabane, Swaziland.
Aidsfonds · NLSwaziland National Trust Commission · SZUniversity of Amsterdam · NLClinton Health Access Initiative · USGlobal Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngaging communities in community-based health research is increasingly being adopted in low- and middle-income countries. The use of community advisory boards (CABs) is one method of practicing community involvement in health research. To date, few studies provide in-depth accounts of the strategies that CAB members use to practice community engagement. We assessed the perspectives, experiences and practices of the first local CAB in Eswatini (formerly known as Swaziland), which was implemented as part of the MaxART Early Access to ART for All study.

methodsTrained Swazi research assistants conducted two focus group discussions and 13 semi-structured interviews with CAB members who had been part of the MaxART study for at least 2.5 years. Interviews explored CAB composition and recruitment, the activities of CAB members, the mechanisms used to engage with communities and the challenges they faced in their role.

resultsThe MaxART CAB played an active role in the implementation of the Early Access to Art for All study, and activities mainly focused on: (1) promoting ethical conduct, in particular privacy, consent and confidentiality; (2) communication and education, communicating about the study and educating the community on the benefits of HIV testing and early access to HIV treatment; and (3) liaising between the community and the research team. Strategies for interacting with communities were varied and included attending general community meetings, visiting health facilities and visiting public places such as cattle dipping tanks, buses, bars and churches. Differences in the approach to community engagement between CAB members living in the study areas and those residing outside were identified.

conclusionThe experiences of the first CAB in Eswatini demonstrate that community engagement using CABs is a valuable mechanism for engaging communities in implementation studies. Considerations that could impact CAB functioning include clearly defining the scope of the CAB, addressing issues of CAB independence, the CAB budget, providing emotional support for CAB members, and providing continuous training and capacity building. These issues should be addressed during the early stages of CAB formation in order to optimize functioning.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesCommunity ParticipationAdultAgedAnti-HIV AgentsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEswatiniFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsCABCommunity Advisory BoardCommunity EngagementCommunity System StrengtheningEarly ARTEswatiniHIVImplementation researchSwazilandTest and Treat

Identifiers

PMID31311526
PMCPMC6636129
OpenAlexW2961650245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.