Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31311511›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2019

Older patients' experiences with a shared decision-making process on choosing dialysis or conservative care for advanced chronic kidney disease: a survey study.

Wouter R Verberne, Wanda S Konijn, Karen Prantl, Janneke Dijkers, Margriet T Roskam, Johannes J M van Delden, Willem Jan W Bos

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06799936 (A Communication-Priming Intervention to Improve Shared Decision-Making Between Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Clinicians), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06799936 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Communication-Priming Intervention to Improve Shared Decision-Making Between Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Clinicians: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2025 to 2027Enrolled280ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5Arms"CKD Jumpstart- Tips" priming intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. ASN Kidney Health Guidance on Conservative Management in People with Kidney Failure.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Survival of patients who opt for dialysis versus conservative care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Choosing conservative care in advanced chronic kidney disease: a scoping review of patients' perspectives.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Changing the choice from dialysis to conservative care or vice versa in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wouter R VerberneDepartment of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. w.verberne@antoniusziekenhuis.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4262-7162
Wanda S KonijnDutch Kidney Patients Association (NVN), Bussum, The Netherlands.
Karen PrantlDutch Kidney Patients Association (NVN), Bussum, The Netherlands.
Janneke DijkersDepartment of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Margriet T RoskamDepartment of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Johannes J M van DeldenUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willem Jan W BosDepartment of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany older patients approaching end-stage kidney disease have to decide whether to go for dialysis or non-dialytic conservative care (CC). Shared decision-making is recommended to align the treatment plan with the patient's preferences and values. Little is known about older patients' experiences with shared decision-making on dialysis or CC.

methodsWe performed a survey study, in collaboration with the Dutch Kidney Patients Association, in 99 patients aged ≥70 years who had chosen dialysis (n = 75) or CC (n = 24) after a shared decision-making process involving an experienced multidisciplinary team.

resultsPatients stated to be overall satisfied with the shared decision-making process (% with score 6-10 on 11-point Likert scale, dialysis versus CC: 93% vs. 91%, P = 0.06), and treatment decision (87% vs. 91%, P = 0.03). However, patients also reported negative experiences, especially those who had chosen dialysis. Such negative experiences were related to the timing, informing, and level of decision-making being shared. More patients who selected dialysis indicated to have felt forced to make a decision, mostly due to the circumstances, such as their deteriorating health or kidney function, or by their nephrologist (31% vs. 5%, P = 0.01). Also, patients who selected dialysis mentioned a perceived lack of choice as most common reason for choosing dialysis, and 55% considered their own opinion as most important rather than their nephrologists' or relatives' opinion compared to 90% of the patients who had chosen CC (P = 0.02). A subset of patients who had chosen dialysis still doubted their treatment decision compared to no patient who had chosen CC (17% vs. 0%, P = 0.03).

conclusionsOlder patients reported contrasting experiences with shared decision-making on dialysis or CC. Despite high overall satisfaction, the underlying negative experiences illustrate important but modifiable barriers to an optimal shared decision-making process.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorConservative TreatmentDecision Making, SharedRenal DialysisAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMalePatient SatisfactionSelf ReportAgedChronic kidney failureConservative treatmentRenal dialysisShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID31311511
PMCPMC6635995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.