ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2019
GC content of vertebrate exome landscapes reveal areas of accelerated protein evolution.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear speckles: a fundamental layer of gene regulation.Trends in cell biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Rapid Targeted Assembly of the Proteome Reveals Evolutionary Variation of GC Content in Avian Lice.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2024Article
- Cysteine Enrichment Mediates Co-Option of Uricase in Reptilian Skin and Transition to Uricotelism.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Emergence and influence of sequence bias in evolutionarily malleable, mammalian tandem arrays.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Advances in Vertebrate (Cyto)Genomics Shed New Light on Fish Compositional Genome Evolution.Genes · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- A computational exploration of resilience and evolvability of protein-protein interaction networks.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Sequencing refractory regions in bird genomes are hotspots for accelerated protein evolution.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Regional effect on the molecular clock rate of protein evolution in Eutherian and Metatherian genomes.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Quantitative Approach to Fish Cytogenetics in the Context of Vertebrate Genome Evolution.Genes · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid accumulation of vertebrate genome sequences render comparative genomics a powerful approach to study macro-evolutionary events. The assessment of phylogenic relationships between species routinely depends on the analysis of sequence homology at the nucleotide or protein level.
resultsWe analyzed mRNA GC content, codon usage and divergence of orthologous proteins in 55 vertebrate genomes. Data were visualized in genome-wide landscapes using a sliding window approach. Landscapes of GC content reveal both evolutionary conservation of clustered genes, and lineage-specific changes, so that it was possible to construct a phylogenetic tree that closely matched the classic "tree of life". Landscapes of GC content also strongly correlated to landscapes of amino acid usage: positive correlation with glycine, alanine, arginine and proline and negative correlation with phenylalanine, tyrosine, methionine, isoleucine, asparagine and lysine. Peaks of GC content correlated strongly with increased protein divergence.
conclusionsLandscapes of base- and amino acid composition of the coding genome opens a new approach in comparative genomics, allowing identification of discrete regions in which protein evolution accelerated over deep evolutionary time. Insight in the evolution of genome structure may spur novel studies assessing the evolutionary benefit of genes in particular genomic regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.