Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31311055›Full record

ReviewSeminars in speech and language2019

The Role of Executive Function in Developmental Stuttering.

Julie D Anderson, Levi C Ofoe

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in speech and language, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Meta-Analytical Review of Executive Function Skills in Adults Who Stutter.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cognitive Flexibility for Semantic and Perceptual Information in Developmental Stuttering.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie D AndersonDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Levi C OfoeDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Cognitive-Linguistic Processes in Developmental StutteringR01DC012517 · NIDCD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, JULIE D · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental stuttering is a complex disorder and children who stutter form a heterogeneous group. Most contemporary researchers would agree that multiple factors, including those associated with linguistic, motor, sensory, and emotional processes, are likely involved in its development and/or maintenance. There is growing evidence, however, that cognitive processes also play a role. In this article, we briefly review behavioral and parent-report studies of executive function in children who stutter, the findings of which have generally suggested that these skills may be challenging for at least some children who stutter. We then consider how deficits in executive function could provide an explanatory account for not only the multifactorial nature of developmental stuttering but also the considerable amount of variability that exists among individuals who stutter.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCognitionFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMaleMental RecallRisk FactorsStuttering

Identifiers

PMID31311055
PMCPMC6910129
OpenAlexW2962267516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.