Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31310658›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2019

Differentiation Capacity of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells into Keratocyte Lineage.

Aurelie Dos Santos, Alis Balayan, Martha L Funderburgh, John Ngo, James L Funderburgh, Sophie X Deng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cell and Gene Therapy in Equine Ocular Disease.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Generation of Functional Immortalized Human Corneal Stromal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aurelie Dos SantosStein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Alis BalayanStein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Martha L FunderburghEye and Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
John NgoStein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
James L FunderburghEye and Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Sophie X DengStein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Southern California Eye Institute · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Stem Cells for Corneal EngineeringR01EY016415 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DU, YIQIN · 2006 to 2018
$4.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been extensively studied for their capacity to enhance wound healing and represent a promising research field for generating cell therapies for corneal scars. In the present study, we investigated MSCs from different tissues and their potential to differentiate toward corneal keratocytes. Methods: Adipose-derived stem cells, bone marrow MSCs, umbilical cord stem cells, and corneal stromal stem cells (CSSCs) were characterized by their expression of surface markers CD105, CD90, and CD73, and their multilineage differentiation capacity into adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes. MSCs were also evaluated for their potential to differentiate toward keratocytes, and for upregulation of the anti-inflammatory protein TNFα-stimulated gene-6 (TNFAIP6) after simulation by IFN-γ and TNF-α. Results: Keratocyte lineage induction was achieved in all MSCs as indicated by the upregulated expression of keratocyte markers, including keratocan, lumican, and carbohydrate sulfotransferase. TNFAIP6 response to inflammatory stimulation was observed only in CSSCs; increasing by 3-fold compared with the control (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Based on our findings, CSSCs appeared to have the greatest differentiation potential toward the keratocyte lineage and the greatest anti-inflammatory properties in vitro.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationCell Adhesion MoleculesCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCorneal KeratocytesFlow CytometryHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsRNATumor Necrosis Factor-alphaCell Adhesion MoleculesRNATNFAIP6 protein, humanTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID31310658
PMCPMC6636549
OpenAlexW2957989341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.