Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31310403›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2019

His bundle pacing, learning curve, procedure characteristics, safety, and feasibility: Insights from a large international observational study.

Daniel Keene, Ahran D Arnold, Marek Jastrzębski, Haran Burri, Steven Zweibel, Eric Crespo, Badrinathan Chandrasekaran, Sukhbinder Bassi, Nader Joghetaei, Matthew Swift and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04749836 (Registry of His Bundle, Bachmann Bundle and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Various Pacing Indications), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04749836 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Registry of His Bundle, Bachmann Bundle and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Various Pacing Indications

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled150ConditionsAV Block, Bundle-Branch Block, Atrial Fibrillation RapidArmsHis bundle pacing implantation, Left bundle branch area pacing implantation, Bachmann bundle pacing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Success and complication rates of conduction system pacing: a meta-analytical observational comparison of left bundle branch area pacing and His bundle pacing.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Conduction system pacing in prosthetic heart valves.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Conduction system pacing, a European survey: insights from clinical practice.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Managing Bradycardia in Patients After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. His Bundle Pacing in the Era of Left Bundle Branch Pacing.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Daniel KeeneNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London.ORCID 0000-0001-7472-7358
Ahran D ArnoldNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London.
Marek JastrzębskiFirst Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3318-6601
Haran BurriDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, Cardiology, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4393-5338
Steven ZweibelDepartment of Interventional Electrophysiology, Hartford Hospital, Interventional Electrophysiology, Hartford.ORCID 0000-0002-1967-6559
Eric CrespoDepartment of Interventional Electrophysiology, Hartford Hospital, Interventional Electrophysiology, Hartford.
Badrinathan ChandrasekaranCardiology Department, Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon.
Sukhbinder BassiCardiology Department, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Ashfield.
Nader JoghetaeiDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Landkreis Erding, Cardiology, Munich, Germany.
Matthew SwiftCardiology Department, Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon.
Pawel MoskalFirst Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5644-5963
Darrel P FrancisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London.
Paul FoleyCardiology Department, Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon.
Matthew J Shun-ShinNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London.
Zachary I WhinnettNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CS/15/3/31405British Heart Foundation FS/13/44/30291British Heart Foundation FS/15/53/31615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHis-bundle pacing (HBP) provides physiological ventricular activation. Observational studies have demonstrated the techniques' feasibility; however, data have come from a limited number of centers.

objectivesWe set out to explore the contemporary global practice in HBP focusing on the learning curve, procedural characteristics, and outcomes.

methodsThis is a retrospective, multicenter observational study of patients undergoing attempted HBP at seven centers. Pacing indication, fluoroscopy time, HBP thresholds, and lead reintervention and deactivation rates were recorded. Where centers had systematically recorded implant success rates from the outset, these were collated.

resultsA total of 529 patients underwent attempted HBP during the study period (2014-19) with a mean follow-up of 217 ± 303 days. Most implants were for bradycardia indications. In the three centers with the systematic collation of all attempts, the overall implant success rate was 81%, which improved to 87% after completion of 40 cases. All seven centers reported data on successful implants. The mean fluoroscopy time was 11.7 ± 12.0 minutes, the His-bundle capture threshold at implant was 1.4 ± 0.9 V at 0.8 ± 0.3 ms, and it was 1.3 ± 1.2 V at 0.9 ± 0.2 ms at last device check. HBP lead reintervention or deactivation (for lead displacement or rise in threshold) occurred in 7.5% of successful implants. There was evidence of a learning curve: fluoroscopy time and HBP capture threshold reduced with greater experience, plateauing after approximately 30-50 cases.

conclusionWe found that it is feasible to establish a successful HBP program, using the currently available implantation tools. For physicians who are experienced at pacemaker implantation, the steepest part of the learning curve appears to be over the first 30-50 cases.

Indexed as

Cardiac Pacing, ArtificialLearning CurveAction PotentialsAgedAged, 80 and overArrhythmias, CardiacBundle of HisClinical CompetenceEuropeFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyHis bundle pacingHis bundle pacing characteristicsHis bundle pacing feasibilityHis bundle pacing learning curvephysiological pacing

Identifiers

PMID31310403
PMCPMC7038224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.