Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31310297›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2019

Effect of Flexible Family Visitation on Delirium Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: The ICU Visits Randomized Clinical Trial.

Regis Goulart Rosa, Maicon Falavigna, Daiana Barbosa da Silva, Daniel Sganzerla, Mariana Martins Siqueira Santos, Renata Kochhann, Rafaela Moraes de Moura, Cláudia Severgnini Eugênio, Tarissa da Silva Ribeiro Haack, Mirceli Goulart Barbosa and 39 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02932358 (Effectiveness and Safety of a Flexible Family Visitation Model for Delirium Prevention in Adult Intensive Care Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 103 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
27.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02932358 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness and Safety of a Flexible Family Visitation Model for Delirium Prevention in Adult Intensive Care Units: a Cluster-randomized, Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Moinhos de VentoRan2017 to 2018Enrolled1,650ConditionsDeliriumArmsFlexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM), Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The shared injury of critical illness.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

49 authors at 19 institutions in 3 countries.

Regis Goulart RosaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Maicon FalavignaResearch Projects Office, HMV, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Daiana Barbosa da SilvaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Daniel SganzerlaResearch Projects Office, HMV, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Mariana Martins Siqueira SantosResearch Projects Office, HMV, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Renata KochhannResearch Projects Office, HMV, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Rafaela Moraes de MouraResearch Projects Office, HMV, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Cláudia Severgnini EugênioIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Tarissa da Silva Ribeiro HaackIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Mirceli Goulart BarbosaResearch Projects Office, HMV, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Caroline Cabral RobinsonResearch Projects Office, HMV, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Daniel SchneiderResearch Projects Office, HMV, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Débora Mariani de OliveiraResearch Projects Office, HMV, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Rodrigo Wiltgen JeffmanResearch Projects Office, HMV, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Alexandre Biasi CavalcantiBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), São Paulo, São Paulo.
Flávia Ribeiro MachadoBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), São Paulo, São Paulo.
Luciano Cesar Pontes AzevedoBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), São Paulo, São Paulo.
Jorge Ibrain Figueira SalluhBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), São Paulo, São Paulo.
José Augusto Santos PellegriniIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Rafael Barberena MoraesIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Rafael Botelho FoerngesIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Andre Peretti TorellyIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Santa Rita, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Lizandra de Oliveira AyresIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitário do Oeste do Paraná, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil.
Pericles Almeida Delfino DuarteIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitário do Oeste do Paraná, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil.
Wilson José LovatoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Patrick Harrison Santana SampaioIntensive Care Unit, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.
Lúcio Couto de Oliveira JúniorIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Geral Clériston Andrade, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.
Jorge Luiz da Rocha ParanhosIntensive Care Unit, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São João Del Rei, São João Del Rei, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Alessandro da Silva DantasIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Regional Doutor Deoclécio Marques de Lucena, Parnamirim, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Pollyanna Iracema Peixoto Gouveia Gomes de BritoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Regional Doutor Deoclécio Marques de Lucena, Parnamirim, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Eliane Aparecida Peixoto PauloIntensive Care Unit, Fundação Hospital Adriano Jorge, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Marcos Antônio Cavalcanti GallindoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Agamenon Magalhães, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Janaina PilauIntensive Care Unit, Hospital da Cidade, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Helen Martins ValentimIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
José Mario Meira TelesIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Urgências de Goiânia, Goiânia, Goiânia, Brazil.
Vandack NobreBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), São Paulo, São Paulo.
Daniella Cunha BirrielIntensive Care Unit, Pavilhão Pereira Filho, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Livia Corrêa E CastroIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Regional do Baixo Amazonas, Santarém, Pará, Brazil.
Andréia Martins SpechtIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Gregory Saraiva MedeirosIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Tulio Frederico ToniettoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Emersom Cicilini MesquitaDepartment of Critical Care, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Nilton Brandão da SilvaSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Jeffrey E KorteDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Luciano Serpa HammesResearch Projects Office, HMV, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Alberto GianniniUnit of Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ospedale dei Bambini-ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Fernando Augusto BozzaBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), São Paulo, São Paulo.
Cassiano TeixeiraIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
ICU Visits Study Group Investigators and the Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet)
Hospital Moinhos de Vento · BRBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network · BRHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRHospital Universitário Regional do Norte do Paraná · BRUniversidade Estadual de Feira de Santana · BRUniversidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná · BRClinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto · BRD’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRFederal University of São João del-Rei · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRHospital Araújo Jorge · BRHospital Mãe de Deus · BRHospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição · BRInstituto de Olhos de Goiânia · BRMedical University of South Carolina · USOspedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · ITUniversidade de Santa Cruz do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The effects of intensive care unit (ICU) visiting hours remain uncertain. Objective: To determine whether a flexible family visitation policy in the ICU reduces the incidence of delirium. Design, Setting and Participants: Cluster-crossover randomized clinical trial involving patients, family members, and clinicians from 36 adult ICUs with restricted visiting hours (<4.5 hours per day) in Brazil. Participants were recruited from April 2017 to June 2018, with follow-up until July 2018. Interventions: Flexible visitation (up to 12 hours per day) supported by family education (n = 837 patients, 652 family members, and 435 clinicians) or usual restricted visitation (median, 1.5 hours per day; n = 848 patients, 643 family members, and 391 clinicians). Nineteen ICUs started with flexible visitation, and 17 started with restricted visitation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was incidence of delirium during ICU stay, assessed using the CAM-ICU. Secondary outcomes included ICU-acquired infections for patients; symptoms of anxiety and depression assessed using the HADS (range, 0 [best] to 21 [worst]) for family members; and burnout for ICU staff (Maslach Burnout Inventory). Results: Among 1685 patients, 1295 family members, and 826 clinicians enrolled, 1685 patients (100%) (mean age, 58.5 years; 47.2% women), 1060 family members (81.8%) (mean age, 45.2 years; 70.3% women), and 737 clinicians (89.2%) (mean age, 35.5 years; 72.9% women) completed the trial. The mean daily duration of visits was significantly higher with flexible visitation (4.8 vs 1.4 hours; adjusted difference, 3.4 hours [95% CI, 2.8 to 3.9]; P < .001). The incidence of delirium during ICU stay was not significantly different between flexible and restricted visitation (18.9% vs 20.1%; adjusted difference, -1.7% [95% CI, -6.1% to 2.7%]; P = .44). Among 9 prespecified secondary outcomes, 6 did not differ significantly between flexible and restricted visitation, including ICU-acquired infections (3.7% vs 4.5%; adjusted difference, -0.8% [95% CI, -2.1% to 1.0%]; P = .38) and staff burnout (22.0% vs 24.8%; adjusted difference, -3.8% [95% CI, -4.8% to 12.5%]; P = .36). For family members, median anxiety (6.0 vs 7.0; adjusted difference, -1.6 [95% CI, -2.3 to -0.9]; P < .001) and depression scores (4.0 vs 5.0; adjusted difference, -1.2 [95% CI, -2.0 to -0.4]; P = .003) were significantly better with flexible visitation. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients in the ICU, a flexible family visitation policy, vs standard restricted visiting hours, did not significantly reduce the incidence of delirium. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02932358.

Indexed as

Visitors to PatientsAnxietyBrazilBurnout, ProfessionalCritical CareCross-Over StudiesDeliriumDepressionFamilyFemaleHealth EducationHospitalizationHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsMale

Identifiers

PMID31310297
PMCPMC6635909
OpenAlexW2959969838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.