ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2019
Evidence for Differential Predictive Performance of the Prime Screen Between Black and White Help-Seeking Youths.
Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Relation Between Aggression and Psychotic-Like Experiences in Help-Seeking Adolescents: The Role of Threat/Control-Override Symptoms.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis in Latinx Populations: Common Issues and Recommendations for Improving Care.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Evidence for Environmental Risk Factors and Cumulative Stress Linking Racial/Ethnic Identity and Psychotic-Like Experiences in ABCD Study Data.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2025Article
- Racial differences in attenuated psychotic symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Identification of Psychosis Risk and Diagnosis of First-Episode Psychosis: Advice for Clinicians.Psychology research and behavior management · 2024Review
- Review of factors resulting in systemic biases in the screening, assessment, and treatment of individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis in the United States.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
- Changes in community providers' screening behaviours, referral practices, and clinical confidence following participation in an early psychosis educational campaign.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Racial and Ethnic Biases in Computational Approaches to Psychopathology.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2022Article
- Equity in Mental Health Services for Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Considering Marginalized Identities and Stressors.Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2022Article
- Screening for Early Emerging Mental Experiences (SEE ME): A Model to Improve Early Detection of Psychosis in Integrated Primary Care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Community Psychosis Risk Screening: An Instrument Development Investigation.Journal of psychiatry and brain science · 2020Article
- Associations between Race, Discrimination, Community Violence, Traumatic Life Events, and Psychosis-Like Experiences in a Sample of College Students.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- The impact of age on the validity of psychosis-risk screening in a sample of help-seeking youth.Psychiatry research · 2019Article
- Considerations for the development and implementation of brief screening tools in the identification of early psychosis.Schizophrenia research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSelf-report screening instruments for emerging psychosis have the potential to improve early detection efforts by increasing the number of true positives among persons deemed to be at "clinical high risk" of the disorder, but their practical utility depends on their validity across race. This study sought to examine whether a commonly used self-report screening tool for psychosis risk performed equally among black and white youths in its ability to predict clinical high-risk status.
methodsBlack (N=58) and white (N=50) help-seeking individuals ages 12-25 (61% female) were assessed with the Prime Screen and the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS). A logistic regression model estimated race differences in the strength of the relation between Prime Screen scores and SIPS-defined risk status.
resultsHigher Prime Screen scores significantly predicted clinical high-risk status among white (p<.01) but not black participants. Among black youths without clinical high risk, self-reported Prime Screen scores more closely resembled scores for youths (black or white) with clinical high risk than scores of white peers who were also without clinical high risk.
conclusionsResults suggest that consideration of race or ethnicity and associated cultural factors is important when screening for clinical high-risk status. Findings support the need to develop culturally valid early psychosis screening tools to promote appropriately tailored early intervention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.