Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31310069›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of fertility & sterility2019

Rubella Immunity in Pregnant Iranian Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Milad Azami, Zahra Jaafari, Ali Soleymani, G Holamreza Badfar, S Hamsi Abbasalizadeh

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A Review on Rubella Vaccine: Iran (1975-2010).Archives of Razi Institute · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Milad AzamiFaculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.
Zahra JaafariHIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Ali SoleymaniDezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran.
G Holamreza BadfarDepartment of Pediatrics, Behbahan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Behbahan, Iran.
S Hamsi AbbasalizadehWomen's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Electronic Address: Shamciabbasalizadeh@gmail.com.
Dezful University of Medical Sciences · IRKerman University of Medical Sciences · IRMedical University of Ilam · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rubella infection within the first trimester of pregnancy may lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes. The present study was conducted to evaluate the immunity against rubella among the pregnant Iranian women. The steps of meta-analyses were conducted based on the MOOSE protocol and results were reported according to the PRISMA guideline. To review the associated English and Persian literature, a comprehensive search was conducted among the international databases such as Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science and Google Scholar search engine as well as Iranian databases, until April 1, 2018 using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) keywords: 'Pregnant', 'Gestational', 'Prenatal care', 'Complications of pregnancy', 'Pregnancy', 'Rubella infection', 'Prevalence, 'Epidemiology', 'Immunity', 'Immunization', 'Antibody', 'Immunogenicity' and 'Iran'. Cochran's Q test and I2 index were used to investigate heterogeneity in the studies. Random effects model was used to estimate the rate of rubella immunity. The obtained data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Ver.2. Fifteen studies constituting 7,601 pregnant Iranian women met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled rubella immunity rate was 90.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 86.1-93.1]. Rubella immunity rates were respectively 88.6% (95% CI: 80.6-93.6) and 91.5% (95% CI: 88.1-93.9) before and after national vaccine program. Rubella immunity rates were 91.4% (95% CI: 87.8-94.0) and 87.2% (95% CI: 74.3-94.1) based on the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and haemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) methods, respectively. There was no significant association between rubella immunity and vaccination program (P=0.398), diagnostic methods (P=0.355), geographic regions (P=0.286), quality of the studies (P=0.751), occupation (P=0.639), residence (P=0.801), and year of the studies (P=0.164), but it was significantly associated with age (P<0.001). Despite high rubella immunity among the pregnant Iranian women, anti-rubella antibody screening is recommended for all women of childbearing age.

Indexed as

ImmunityIranMeta-AnalysisPregnant WomenRubella

Identifiers

PMID31310069
PMCPMC6642423
OpenAlexW2990740238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.