Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31309907›Full record

ArticleInternational psychogeriatrics2019

Validation of neuropsychological tests for the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol.

Qinqin Meng, Huali Wang, John Strauss, Kenneth M Langa, Xinxin Chen, Mingwei Wang, Qiumin Qu, Wei Chen, Weihong Kuang, Nan Zhang and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International psychogeriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Qinqin MengInstitute of Social Science Survey, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Huali WangDementia Care & Research Center, Beijing Dementia Key Lab, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health, Key Laboratory of Mental Health, National Health Commission, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-6493
John StraussDepartment of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kenneth M LangaMedical School, Institute for Social Research, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Xinxin ChenInstitute of Social Science Survey, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Mingwei WangThe First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Brain Aging and Cognitive Neuroscience Key Laboratory of Hebei Province, Hebei, Shijiazhuang, China.
Qiumin QuFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Wei ChenSir Shaw Run Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.
Weihong KuangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Nan ZhangTianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tao LiDementia Care & Research Center, Beijing Dementia Key Lab, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health, Key Laboratory of Mental Health, National Health Commission, Beijing, China.
Yafeng WangInstitute of Social Science Survey, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yaohui ZhaoNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNHebei Medical University · CNSichuan University · CNSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University General Hospital · CNUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
China Health and Retirement Longitudinal StudyR01AG037031 · NIA · PEKING UNIVERSITY · PI STRAUSS, JOHN A, WANG, YAFENG · 2010 to 2024
$15.1M
Health and Retirement Study: Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP)U01AG058499 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LANGA, KENNETH M · 2018 to 2023
$8.3M
Harmonized Cognitive and Dementia Assessment in ChinaR01AG053228 · NIA · PEKING UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, YUEQIN, STRAUSS, JOHN A · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
Archiving the CHARLS DataR03AG049144 · NIA · PEKING UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, YAOHUI · 2015 to 2016
$107k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037031NIA NIH HHS R01 AG053228NIA NIH HHS R03 AG049144NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740NIA NIH HHS U01 AG058499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare and validate neurocognitive tests in the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP) for the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), and to identify appropriate tests to be administered in future waves of CHARLS.

methodsWe recruited 825 individuals from the CHARLS sample and 766 subjects from hospitals in six provinces and cities in China. All participants were administered the HCAP-neurocognitive tests, and their informants were interviewed regarding the respondents' functional status. Trained clinicians administered the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR) to assess the respondents' cognitive status independently.

resultsThe testing protocol took an average of 58 minutes to complete. Refusal rates for tests of general cognition, episodic memory, and language were less than 10%. All neurocognitive test scores significantly correlated with the CDR global score (correlation coefficients ranged from 0.139 to 0.641). The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) - telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS), community screening instrument for dementia (CSI-D) for respondent, episodic memory and language tests each accounted for more than 20% of the variance in global CDR score (p < 0.001) in bivariate tests. In the CHARLS subsample, age and education were associated with neuropsychological performance across most cognitive domains, and with functional status.

conclusionA brief set of the CHARLS-HCAP neurocognitive tests are feasible and valid to be used in the CHARLS sample and hospital samples. It could be applied in the future waves of the CHARLS study, and it allows estimating the prevalence of dementia in China through the population-based CHARLS.

Indexed as

CognitionMental Status and Dementia TestsAgedAged, 80 and overAgingChinaCognition DisordersDementiaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetirementcognitive testingdementiaelderlymemorypopulation

Identifiers

PMID31309907
PMCPMC8082093
OpenAlexW2959390653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.