ArticleNano letters2019
Measuring Nanoparticle Polarizability Using Fluorescence Microscopy.
Article in Nano letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- A new route towards polarized luminescence: 0D/2D nanocomposites.Light, science & applications · 2024Article
- Temperature Effects on Optical Trapping Stability.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Bead based facile assay for sensitive quantification of native state green fluorescent protein.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Optical Manipulation of Lanthanide-Doped Nanoparticles: How to Overcome Their Limitations.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Using a novel method developed to quantify the polarizability of photoluminescent nanoparticles in water, we present experimental observations of the extraordinary polarizability exhibited by nanoparticles of commensurate size with the Debye screening length, confirming previously reported theory. Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) are ideal model nanoparticles to demonstrate this assay, due to their tunable size and bright photoluminescence. This assay is based upon microfluidic chambers with microelectrodes that generate trapping potentials that are weaker than thermal energy. By comparing the local electric field strength and variations in QD concentration, their polarizability was computed and found to agree with estimates based upon the hydrodynamic diameter found using light scattering. Strikingly, the polarizability of the nanoparticles increased 30-fold in low salt conditions compared to high salt conditions due to the increased thickness of the Debye layer relative to the particle radius. In addition to providing evidence that corroborates theoretical work studying direct solutions to the Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations, these observations provide an explanation for the previously observed conductivity dependence of biomolecule polarizability. As the polarizability of nanoparticles is of high importance to the electrically directed assembly of particles, as well as their interactions with other materials in complex environments, we anticipate that these results will be highly relevant to ongoing efforts in materials by design and nanomedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.