Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31309706›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2019

Patterns of hysterectomy in India: a national and state-level analysis of the Fourth National Family Health Survey (2015-2016).

S Desai, A Shukla, D Nambiar, R Ved

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Thyroid-stimulating Hormone Levels in Women with Uterine Fibroids: A Healthcare Setting Perspective from Coastal Karnataka.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. An audit of hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in India: Story of a decade.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S DesaiPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2596-9726
A ShuklaPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
D NambiarThe George Institute India, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5682-6109
R VedNational Health Systems Resource Centre, New Delhi, India.
Population Council Institute · INGeorge Institute for Global Health · INNational Health Systems Resource Centre · IN

Funding

RASTA initiative of the Population Council's India country office under the Evidence ProjectUSAID
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe National Family Health Survey-4 in India provided the first nationally representative estimates of hysterectomy among women aged 15-49. This paper aims to examine the national and state-level age-specific prevalence of hysterectomy, individual and household level factors associated with the procedure, and state-level indicators that may explain variation across states.

designCross-sectional, nationally representative household survey.

settingNational Family Health Survey was conducted across all Indian states and union territories between 2015 and 2016. POPULATION: The survey covered 699 686 women between the ages of 15 and 49 years.

methodsDescriptive analyses and multivariate logistic regression.

main outcome measuresWomen who reported ever having a hysterectomy and age at hysterectomy.

resultsAge-specific prevalence of hysterectomy was 0.36% (0.33,0.39) among women aged 15-29; 3.59% (3.45,3.74) among women aged 30-39; and 9.20% (8.94,9.46) among women 40-49 years. There was considerable variation in prevalence by state. Four states reported age-specific prevalence similar to high-income settings. Approximately two-thirds of hysterectomies were conducted in private facilities, with similar patterns across age groups. At the national level, higher age and parity (at least two children); not having had formal schooling; rural residence (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.36; 95% CI 1.27,1.45; P < 0.01) and higher wealth status were associated with higher odds of hysterectomy. Previously sterilised women had lower odds (AOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.61,0,68; P < 0.01) of reporting hysterectomy. Exploratory analyses suggest state-level factors associated with prevalence of hysterectomy include caesarean section, female illiteracy, and women's employment.

conclusionsHysterectomy patterns among women aged 15-49 in India indicate the critical need to ensure treatment options for gynaecological morbidity and to address hysterectomy among young women in particular.

fundingThis study was part of the RASTA initiative of the Population Council's India country office under the Evidence Project supported by USAID. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Hysterectomy patterns in India highlight the need for alternatives to treat gynaecological morbidity among younger women.

Indexed as

Women's HealthAdolescentAdultAge DistributionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansHysterectomyIndiaLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPrevalenceSocioeconomic FactorsUterine DiseasesYoung AdultepidemiologygynaecologyhysterectomyIndiamenstrual bleeding

Identifiers

PMID31309706
PMCPMC6772015
OpenAlexW2956628658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.