ArticleMolecular biology reports2019
Recent and old duplications in crustaceans "Internal Transcribed Spacer 1″: structural and phylogenetic implications.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrafast PCR assay for identification of three king crabs-Food science and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internal Transcribed Spacer structures are important in preserving accessibility to specific enzymes for the maturation of rRNAs. ITS1 sequences reported in the literature in Crustaceans range between 182 and 820 bp and are characterized by the absence of repeats or the presence of only a limited number of microsatellites. Here, we sequenced ITS1 for a range of shrimp families (infraorder Caridea) and show that most taxa have much larger ITS1 sequences. We find a high number of microsatellites in Alpheus hebes and Crangon crangon and we report repeat units in Pandalidae, Palaemonidae and mainly in Alpheidae species. Up to four repeats were found in A. vanderbilti (1915 bp), A. rostratus (1635 bp) and A. lottini (1625 bp). In general, four helices were found in ITS1. Repeat units led to extra hairpins and loops. No conserved positions occurred except in helix 4. Three clades were defined in A. lottini for the first time. We estimated the ITS1 divergence rate for the three clades of A. lottini collected in French Polynesia using existing calibrations of substitution rates. Rates of sequence evolution are largely influenced by repeat units, which likely evolve separately. By comparison with COI marker, we estimated the divergence rate of the whole ITS1 sequence to range from 0.5 to 1.4% Pmy and between 0.12 and 0.5% for the 3' end of ITS1 located outside the repeat units. Given the degree of identity between repeats, we suggest that a duplication event recently occurred in A. floridanus (98% identity) whereas an ancient duplication happened in A. sulcatus (50% identity) early at the origination of the group Alpheidae, approximately 50 mya ago. In conclusion, our results highlight an over representation of shorter ITS1 sequences in public repositories, and underlines the importance to further understand patterns of molecular evolution of this functionally important gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31309452What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.