ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2019
Clinical Effectiveness of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide (FAc) (ILUVIEN™) in Patients with Diabetic Macular Oedema (DMO) Refractory to Prior Therapy: The Manchester Experience.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fluocinolone acetonide vitreous insert for chronic diabetic macular oedema: a systematic review with meta-analysis of real-world experience.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- What have we learned from a decade treating patients with diabetic macular oedema with 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant?Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Suboptimal outcomes and treatment burden of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular oedema in phakic patients.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Effectiveness and safety of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant in diabetic macular edema patients considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies (REACT): a prospective, non-randomized, and multicenter study.International ophthalmology · 2023Observational
- Intraocular Pressure Changes After Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant: Results from Four European Countries.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022Article
- Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Review
- Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers of Inflammation in Diabetic Macular Edema Treated by Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Drug-Delivery System Implant.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2020Article
- Clinical-Decision Criteria to Identify Recurrent Diabetic Macular Edema Patients Suitable for Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Therapy (ILUVIENClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Review
- Corticosteroids for Diabetic Macular Edema.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiabetic macular oedema (DMO) remains a significant cause of sight loss in the UK. Despite macular laser and anti-VEGF agents, a large proportion of patients remain with persistent DMO. We present our results of using 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant in this cohort with up to 3 years of follow-up.
methodsThis is a single-centre retrospective review of patients treated with FAc implant for refractory DMO. The primary efficacy end point was visual acuity and secondary efficacy end point was central retinal thickness (CRT) on OCT. A primary safety end point was a rise in IOP requiring treatment.
resultsTwenty-one eyes were identified with an average follow-up of 27 months (6-36 months). Visual acuity change from baseline was - 0.1 ETDRS letters at year 1 (n = 13), 8.1 letters at year 2 (n = 13) and 10.7 letters at year 3 (n = 10). CRT improved by - 132.1 µm at year 1 (n = 15), - 172.8 µm at year 2 (n = 13) and - 157.8 µm at year 3 (n = 10). Five eyes (24%) required further anti-VEGF during follow-up and two (9.5%) required further focal laser. IOP rise requiring treatment was noted in eight eyes (38%). Seven were steroid induced. One was caused by rubeotic glaucoma. Six (75%) were managed medically and the remaining two also required surgery.
conclusionThis data add to the limited real-world data on FAc in DMO with 3 years of follow-up. Vision and macular architectures both improved at varying rates over 3 years in patients with refractory DMO. IOP rise is a risk but, in the majority, it can be managed medically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.