Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31309335›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

The importance of level stratification for quantitative MR studies of lumbar intervertebral discs: a cross-sectional analysis in 101 healthy adults.

H Hebelka, K Lagerstrand, H Brisby, P J Owen, M J Quittner, T Rantalainen, D L Belavy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Effective disc age: a statistical model for age-dependent and level-specific lumbar disc degeneration using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

H HebelkaDepartment of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. hanna.hebelka@vgregion.se.ORCID 0000-0001-5304-8241
K LagerstrandDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
H BrisbyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
P J OwenInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
M J QuittnerInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
T RantalainenInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
D L BelavyInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9307-832X

Funding

the School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University Grant ID: Belavy 2014-2017the Swedish state under the agreement between the swedish government and the county councils, the ALF agreement ALFGBG-792231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate whether quantitative T2-times depend on lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) level.

methodsThe lumbar spine (Th12/L1-L5/S1) of 101 participants (53.5% female, 30.0[± 3.6]years, 173.5[± 9.6]cm and 69.9[± 13.4]kg), without history of back pain, was examined on a 3T scanner with sagittal T2-mapping. All IVDs were stratified according to Pfirrmann grade and lumbar level, with mean T2-time determined for the entire IVD volume and in five subregions of interests.

resultsSignificant level-dependent T2-time differences were detected, both for the entire IVD volume and its subregions. For the entire IVD volume, Pfirrmann grade 2 IVDs displayed 9-18% higher T2-times in Th12/L1 IVDs compared to L2/L3-L5/S1 IVDs (0.001 > p < 0.004) and significantly different T2-times in L1/L2-L2/L3 IVDs compared to most of the IVDs in the lower lumbar spine. In Pfirrmann grades 1, 3 and 4 IVDs, no significant level-dependent T2-time differences were observed for the entire IVD. More pronounced results were observed when comparing IVD subregions, with significant level-dependent differences also within Pfirrmann grade 1 and grade 3 IVDs. For example, in posterior IVD subregions mean T2-time was 80-82% higher in Th12/L1 compared to L3/L4-L4/L5 Pfirrmann grade 1 IVDs (p < 0.05) and 10-14% higher in L5/S1 compared to L3/L4-L4/L5 Pfirrmann grade 3 IVDs (0.02 > p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Significant level-dependent T2-time differences within several Pfirrmann grades, both for the entire IVD volume and for multiple IVD subregions, were shown in this large cohort study. The T2-time differences between levels existed in both non-degenerated and degenerated IVDs. These findings show the importance of stratifying for lumbar level when quantitative IVD studies are performed using T2-mapping. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultFemaleHumansIntervertebral DiscLumbar VertebraeMaleIntervertebral discLumbar levelMagnetic resonance imagingQuantitative MRIT2 mapping

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.