Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31309312›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2020

Digital single-operator video cholangioscopy in treating refractory biliary stones: a multicenter observational study.

Arne Bokemeyer, Christian Gerges, Diana Lang, Dominik Bettenworth, Iyad Kabar, Hartmut Schmidt, Horst Neuhaus, Hansjoerg Ullerich, Frank Lenze, Torsten Beyna

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Single-operator Cholangioscopy Guided Lithotripsy].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arne BokemeyerDepartment of Medicine B for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Christian GergesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Duesseldorf, Kirchfeldstrasse 40, 40217, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Diana LangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Duesseldorf, Kirchfeldstrasse 40, 40217, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dominik BettenworthDepartment of Medicine B for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Iyad KabarDepartment of Medicine B for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Hartmut SchmidtDepartment of Medicine B for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Horst NeuhausDepartment of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Duesseldorf, Kirchfeldstrasse 40, 40217, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hansjoerg UllerichDepartment of Medicine B for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Frank LenzeDepartment of Medicine B for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Torsten BeynaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Duesseldorf, Kirchfeldstrasse 40, 40217, Düsseldorf, Germany. torsten.beyna@evk-duesseldorf.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3071-0428
University Hospital Münster · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard endoscopic treatment might fail to treat biliary stone disease. Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of recently introduced digital single-operator video cholangioscopy (SOVC) for the treatment of difficult biliary stones.

methodsDigital SOVC procedures, performed in two tertiary referral centers between 2015 and 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients with a previous failure of endoscopic standard treatment and a SOVC-based biliary stone treatment using electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) or laser lithotripsy (LL) were included. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the stone removal rate per procedure and per patient.

resultsIn total, 75 examinations with a digital SOVC-assisted biliary stone treatment, performed in 60 patients, were identified. Biliary stones were mainly located extrahepatic (64%) and less frequently intrahepatic (36%). The median stone size was 20 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 10-25 mm) and the median stone number was 1 (IQR: 1-2). Digital SOVC-based treatment of biliary stone disease was successful in 95% of patients and 15% needed at least two treatment sessions. Evaluated per procedure, a complete stone removal was accomplished in 67% of all examinations (including initial and repeated procedures), while an incomplete stone removal was observed in 33% of cases. The per procedure analyzes revealed that the success rates for a complete stone removal were similar between LL and EHL (66% vs. 68%; p = 0.87). Complications, such as postinterventional cholangitis and pancreatitis occurred in 16% of examinations; however, except from one case, all were mild or moderate and no procedure-associated mortality occurred.

conclusionsDigital SOVC-assisted biliary stone treatment is highly effective even in cases with difficult biliary stones and might be considered the new standard of care for these patients. Furthermore, mild up to moderate complications were intermittently observed which might document the complexity of our included cases.

Indexed as

AgedBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeFemaleHumansLithotripsyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVideo-Assisted SurgeryBiliary stonesCholangioscopyDifficult biliary stone diseaseDigital single-operator video cholangioscopySpyGlass DS

Identifiers

PMID31309312
OpenAlexW2961908417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.