Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31309253›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Impact of action planning on visual and body perception in a virtual grasping task.

Wladimir Kirsch, Wilfried Kunde

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wladimir KirschInstitut für Psychologie III der Universität Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. kirsch@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6449-5423
Wilfried KundeInstitut für Psychologie III der Universität Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KI 1620/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study examined mutual influences of visual and body-related signals during planning of an object-oriented action. Participants were to enclose a visual target object using two cursors controlled by the movements of their fingers. During movement preparation, they were asked to judge either the size of the object or a certain finger distance. Both types of judgments were systematically affected by the transformation of finger movements into the movements of visual cursors. We suggest that these biases are perceptual consequences of sensory integration of visual and body-related signals relating to the same external object.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFingersHumansJudgmentMaleMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAction-specific perceptionBody perceptionMultisensory integrationPerception and action planningVisual perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.