Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31308835›Full record

ArticleCore evidence2019

Tedizolid phosphate for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.

Matteo Bassetti, Nadia Castaldo, Alessia Carnelutti, Maddalena Peghin, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Core evidence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01170221 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 6-Day Oral TR-701 Free Acid and 10-Day Oral Linezolid for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrius Therapeutics LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)Ran2010 to 2011Enrolled667ConditionsSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial InfectionsArmsTR-701 FA, Linezolid
NCT01421511 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IV to Oral 6-Day TR-701 Free Acid and IV to Oral 10-Day Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrius Therapeutics LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)Ran2011 to 2013Enrolled666ConditionsSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial InfectionsArmsTR-701 FA, Linezolid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Prolonged tedizolid use in cutaneous non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matteo BassettiInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Nadia CastaldoInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Alessia CarneluttiInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Maddalena PeghinInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Daniele Roberto GiacobbeDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTedizolid phosphate is an oxazolidinone approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) and active against methicillin-resistant

aimsThe objective of this article was to review the evidence for the efficacy and safety of tedizolid phosphate for the treatment of ABSSSI. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Approval of tedizolid phosphate for the treatment of ABSSSI was based on the results of two phase III randomized controlled trials, ESTABLISH-1 (NCT01170221) and ESTABLISH-2 (NCT01421511), comparing 6-day once-daily tedizolid vs 10-day twice-daily linezolid. In ESTABLISH-1, noninferiority was met with early clinical response rates of 79.5% and 79.4% in tedizolid and linezolid groups, respectively (difference 0.1%, 95% CI -6.1% to 6.2%, with a 10% noninferiority margin). In ESTABLISH-2, noninferiority was met with 85% and 83% rates of early clinical response in tedizolid and linezolid groups, respectively (difference 2.6%, 95% CI -3.0% to 8.2%). Pooled data from ESTABLISH-1 and ESTABLISH-2 indicated a lower frequency of thrombocytopenia in tedizolid-treated than in linezolid-treated patients.

conclusionTedizolid offers the option of an intravenous to oral switch, allows once-daily administration, and presents lower risk of myelotoxicity when a 6-day course is used for the treatment of ABSSSI. Greater economic cost associated with this antibiotic could be offset by its shorter treatment duration and possibility of oral administration in routine clinical practice, although either sponsored or nonsponsored postmarketing observational experience remains essential for ultimately confirming the effectiveness and tolerability of tedizolid outside clinical trials.

Indexed as

ABSSSIefficacyMRSAoxazolidinonesafetyStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID31308835
PMCPMC6615724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.