Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31308649›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2019

Assessment of physical functioning and handling of tiotropium/olodaterol Respimat

Karl-Otto Steinmetz, Birgit Abenhardt, Stefan Pabst, Michaela Hänsel, Anke Kondla, Valentina Bayer, Roland Buhl

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Wound healing and signaling pathways.Open life sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karl-Otto SteinmetzLungCenter Darmstadt , Darmstadt, Germany.
Birgit AbenhardtPulmonary Practice , Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan PabstLung Center , Bonn-Duisdorf, Germany.
Michaela HänselTA Respiratory/Biosimilars, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Anke KondlaBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG , Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Valentina BayerBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc ., Ridgefield, CT, USA.
Roland BuhlPulmonary Department, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) show signs of reduced physical activity from the early stages of the disease, impacting morbidity and mortality. Data suggest treatment with tiotropium, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and olodaterol, a long-acting ß Methods: This open-label, single arm, noninterventional study measured changes in physical function in COPD patients treated with tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 μg for approximately 6 weeks (between Visit 1 [baseline] and Visit 2). Primary end point was therapeutic success, defined as a minimum 10-point increase in Physical Functioning Questionnaire (PF-10) score. Secondary end points included change in PF-10 from Visit 1 to Visit 2, the patient's general condition (measured by Physician's Global Evaluation score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2, and patient satisfaction with treatment delivered via the Respimat Results: Therapeutic success was observed in 51.5% of 1578 patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 49.0, 54.0) after approximately 6 weeks of treatment with tiotropium/olodaterol. Mean change in PF-10 score between Visit 1 and Visit 2 was 11.6 points (95% CI 10.7, 12.6). Patient general condition improved as indicated by a general improvement in scores between visits. Most patients were very satisfied or satisfied with tiotropium/olodaterol treatment (82.5%), inhalation (87.5%), and handling of Respimat Conclusion: Tiotropium/olodaterol treatment improved physical functioning in COPD patients. An associated increase in patient general condition was observed. Most patients were very satisfied or satisfied with tiotropium/olodaterol treatment, inhaling, and handling of the Respimat

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAgedBenzoxazinesBronchodilator AgentsDrug CombinationsExercise ToleranceFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsNebulizers and VaporizersPatient SatisfactionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBenzoxazinesBronchodilator AgentsDrug CombinationsMuscarinic AntagonistsTiotropium Bromidetiotropium-olodaterolchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasenoninterventional studyolodaterolphysical activitytiotropium

Identifiers

PMID31308649
PMCPMC6618035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.