Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31308609›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2019

Health Policy Engagement Strategy for the Health Information Technology Policy Project of the Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Disparities Research.

Tiffany Zellner Lawrence, Megan D Douglas, Latrice Rollins, Robina Josiah Willock, Dexter L Cooper, Richard A Gooden, Sherilyn Francis, Dominic H Mack

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tiffany Zellner LawrencePrevention Research Center, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Megan D DouglasDepartment of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Latrice RollinsPrevention Research Center, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Robina Josiah WillockDepartment of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dexter L CooperCancer Health Equity Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Richard A GoodenNational Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sherilyn FrancisNucleus Health Communications, Incorporated, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dominic H MackNational Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

TCC for Health Disparties: Informing & Influencing Health Policy and PracticeU54MD008173 · NIMHD · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SATCHER, DAVID · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP005945NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD008173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rulemaking is one of the most important ways the federal government makes public policy. It frequently has significant impact on individuals, communities, and organizations. Yet, few of those directly affected are familiar with the rulemaking process, and even fewer understand how it works. This article describes a case study of the Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Disparities Research Health Information Technology (TCC HIT) Policy Project's approach to health-policy engagement using: 1) social media; and 2) a webinar to educate stakeholders on the rulemaking process and increase their level of meaningful engagement with the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) proposed rule public comment submission. The webinar "Paying for Quality: What Is the Impact on Health Equity" was promoted through Twitter and held in June 2016. In total, we posted 19 tweets using two distinct hashtags (#MACRA4Equity, #MACRA2Equity) to raise awareness of the upcoming MACRA proposed rule and its possible effects on health equity. Overall, 252 individuals registered for the webinar, and more than half participated (n=133). Most (67%) registrants reported that health policy was not the primary focus of their current position. Based on information provided in the webinar, 95% agreed that their understanding of the topic improved. By the end of the webinar, 44% of participants indicated that they planned to submit public comments for MACRA, a 12% increase compared with those who planned to submit at the time of registration. The TCC health-policy engagement strategy demonstrates the feasibility of engaging a diverse audience around health policy issues, particularly those who are not typically engaged in policy work.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicSocial MediaHealthcare DisparitiesHealth PolicyHealth Services ResearchHumansMedical InformaticsMedicareUnited StatesEvidence-Based Health PolicyHealth PolicyMACRASocial Media

Identifiers

PMID31308609
PMCPMC6604782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.