Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31308485›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Microbiota of the Oropharynx and Endoscope Compared to the Esophagus.

Ikenna C Okereke, Aaron L Miller, Catherine F Hamilton, Adam L Booth, Gabriel L Reep, Clark L Andersen, Sandy T Reynolds, Richard B Pyles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Signatures within esophageal microbiota with progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring Esophageal Microbiomes in Esophageal Diseases: A Systematic Review.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ikenna C OkerekeDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. ikokerek@utmb.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5652-985X
Aaron L MillerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Catherine F HamiltonDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Adam L BoothDivision of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Gabriel L ReepDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Clark L AndersenDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Sandy T ReynoldsDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Richard B PylesDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001439 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI URBAN, RANDALL J · 2015 to 2024
$40.0M
UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR001441 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI AMEREDES, BILL T · 2015 to 2024
$4.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001441NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the microflora in the development of esophageal disease is still largely unknown and is being investigated in more detail. Our goal was to determine how the microbiota levels of endoscope and uvular swabs compared to the levels of tissue biopsies along various points of the esophagus. 17 patients with Barrett's esophagus agreed to participate in the study. Biopsies of esophageal mucosa were taken from the (1) proximal esophagus, (2) mid-esophagus, (3) distal esophagus, and (4) Barrett's esophagus. Swabs were also taken from the uvula and the endoscope. Throughout the esophagus, 17 bacterial genera were detected from the samples. The microflora pattern obtained from the uvula and endoscopic swabs did not correlate well with mucosal biopsies along any aspect of the esophagus. There were statistically significant differences in the levels and proportions of bacteria found when comparing the uvula swab to the esophageal biopsies and when comparing the endoscope swab to the esophageal biopsies. Obtaining a simple swab of the uvula or endoscope itself appears to be a poor substitute for tissue biopsy of esophageal mucosa when evaluating microflora patterns. When performing microflora studies of the esophagus, mucosal biopsies should be used for analysis.

Indexed as

AdultBarrett EsophagusBiopsyEndoscopesEsophageal MucosaEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleMicrobiotaMiddle AgedOropharynxUvula

Identifiers

PMID31308485
PMCPMC6629626
OpenAlexW2956235742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.