Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31308366›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Detection of cell-type-specific risk-CpG sites in epigenome-wide association studies.

Xiangyu Luo, Can Yang, Yingying Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A unified framework for identification of cell-type-specific spatially variable genes in spatial transcriptomic studies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cell type-aware analysis of RNA-seq data.Nature computational science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiangyu LuoInstitute of Statistics and Big Data, Renmin University of China, 100872, Beijing, China.
Can YangDepartment of Mathematics, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China. macyang@ust.hk.
Yingying WeiDepartment of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. yweicuhk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3826-336X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In epigenome-wide association studies, the measured signals for each sample are a mixture of methylation profiles from different cell types. Current approaches to the association detection claim whether a cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) site is associated with the phenotype or not at aggregate level and can suffer from low statistical power. Here, we propose a statistical method, HIgh REsolution (HIRE), which not only improves the power of association detection at aggregate level as compared to the existing methods but also enables the detection of risk-CpG sites for individual cell types.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsEpigenomeArthritis, RheumatoidAsthmaComputational BiologyDatasets as TopicDNA MethylationGenome-Wide Association Study

Identifiers

PMID31308366
PMCPMC6629651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.