ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Improved detection of gene fusions by applying statistical methods reveals oncogenic RNA cancer drivers.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anchored random reverse primer sequencing for quantitative detection of novel gene fusions.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Review
- Current trends in single-cell RNA sequencing applications in diabetes mellitus.FEBS open bio · 2025Review
- Accurate fusion transcript identification from long- and short-read isoform sequencing at bulk or single-cell resolution.Genome research · 2025Article
- Oncogenic gene fusions in cancer: from biology to therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Architects and Partners: The Dual Roles of Non-coding RNAs in Gene Fusion Events.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of structural variants in early breast cancer patients.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Readon: a novel algorithm to identify read-through transcripts with long-read sequencing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- CTAT-LR-fusion: accurate fusion transcript identification from long and short read isoform sequencing at bulk or single cell resolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- SFyNCS detects oncogenic fusions involving non-coding sequences in cancer.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- TargetedCell reports methods · 2023Article
- Integrative Pan-Cancer Genomic and Transcriptomic Analyses of Refractory Metastatic Cancer.Cancer discovery · 2023Article
- SFyNCS detects oncogenic fusions involving non-coding sequences in cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Sources of Cancer Neoantigens beyond Single-Nucleotide Variants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Article
- Editorial: The application of sequencing technologies and bioinformatics methods in cancer biology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- From bulk, single-cell to spatial RNA sequencing.International journal of oral science · 2021Review
- One-Step Polymerase Chain Reaction-Free Nanowire-Based Plasma Cell-Free DNA Assay to Detect EML4-ALK Fusion and to Monitor Resistance in Lung Cancer.The oncologist · 2021Article
- Gene Duplication and Gene Fusion Are Important Drivers of Tumourigenesis during Cancer Evolution.Genes · 2021Review
- Specific splice junction detection in single cells with SICILIAN.Genome biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The extent to which gene fusions function as drivers of cancer remains a critical open question. Current algorithms do not sufficiently identify false-positive fusions arising during library preparation, sequencing, and alignment. Here, we introduce Data-Enriched Efficient PrEcise STatistical fusion detection (DEEPEST), an algorithm that uses statistical modeling to minimize false-positives while increasing the sensitivity of fusion detection. In 9,946 tumor RNA-sequencing datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) across 33 tumor types, DEEPEST identifies 31,007 fusions, 30% more than identified by other methods, while calling 10-fold fewer false-positive fusions in nontransformed human tissues. We leverage the increased precision of DEEPEST to discover fundamental cancer biology. Namely, 888 candidate oncogenes are identified based on overrepresentation in DEEPEST calls, and 1,078 previously unreported fusions involving long intergenic noncoding RNAs, demonstrating a previously unappreciated prevalence and potential for function. DEEPEST also reveals a high enrichment for fusions involving oncogenes in cancers, including ovarian cancer, which has had minimal treatment advances in recent decades, finding that more than 50% of tumors harbor gene fusions predicted to be oncogenic. Specific protein domains are enriched in DEEPEST calls, indicating a global selection for fusion functionality: kinase domains are nearly 2-fold more enriched in DEEPEST calls than expected by chance, as are domains involved in (anaerobic) metabolism and DNA binding. The statistical algorithms, population-level analytic framework, and the biological conclusions of DEEPEST call for increased attention to gene fusions as drivers of cancer and for future research into using fusions for targeted therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.