Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31308241›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Improved detection of gene fusions by applying statistical methods reveals oncogenic RNA cancer drivers.

Roozbeh Dehghannasiri, Donald E Freeman, Milos Jordanski, Gillian L Hsieh, Ana Damljanovic, Erik Lehnert, Julia Salzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Oncogenic gene fusions in cancer: from biology to therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. TargetedCell reports methods · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sources of Cancer Neoantigens beyond Single-Nucleotide Variants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. From bulk, single-cell to spatial RNA sequencing.International journal of oral science · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roozbeh DehghannasiriDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0001-7413-3437
Donald E FreemanDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Milos JordanskiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Gillian L HsiehDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Ana DamljanovicSeven Bridges Genomics Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142.
Erik LehnertSeven Bridges Genomics Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142.
Julia SalzmanDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; julia.salzman@stanford.edu.

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MEDICAL INFORMATION SCIENCEST15LM007033 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITIS · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Cancer Systems Biology Scholars ProgramR25CA180993 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
Unbiased discovery of mechanisms regulating circRNAR01GM116847 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SALZMAN, JULIA · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA180993NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116847NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent to which gene fusions function as drivers of cancer remains a critical open question. Current algorithms do not sufficiently identify false-positive fusions arising during library preparation, sequencing, and alignment. Here, we introduce Data-Enriched Efficient PrEcise STatistical fusion detection (DEEPEST), an algorithm that uses statistical modeling to minimize false-positives while increasing the sensitivity of fusion detection. In 9,946 tumor RNA-sequencing datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) across 33 tumor types, DEEPEST identifies 31,007 fusions, 30% more than identified by other methods, while calling 10-fold fewer false-positive fusions in nontransformed human tissues. We leverage the increased precision of DEEPEST to discover fundamental cancer biology. Namely, 888 candidate oncogenes are identified based on overrepresentation in DEEPEST calls, and 1,078 previously unreported fusions involving long intergenic noncoding RNAs, demonstrating a previously unappreciated prevalence and potential for function. DEEPEST also reveals a high enrichment for fusions involving oncogenes in cancers, including ovarian cancer, which has had minimal treatment advances in recent decades, finding that more than 50% of tumors harbor gene fusions predicted to be oncogenic. Specific protein domains are enriched in DEEPEST calls, indicating a global selection for fusion functionality: kinase domains are nearly 2-fold more enriched in DEEPEST calls than expected by chance, as are domains involved in (anaerobic) metabolism and DNA binding. The statistical algorithms, population-level analytic framework, and the biological conclusions of DEEPEST call for increased attention to gene fusions as drivers of cancer and for future research into using fusions for targeted therapy.

Indexed as

Gene FusionOncogenesStatistics as TopicAlgorithmsBase SequenceDatabases, GeneticGenomic InstabilityHumansNeoplasmsProteomeRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, NeoplasmProteomeRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Neoplasmbioinformaticscancer genomicsgene fusionpan-cancer analysisTCGA

Identifiers

PMID31308241
PMCPMC6681709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.