Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31308233›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

In situ measurement of cesium-137 contamination in fruits from the northern Marshall Islands.

Carlisle E W Topping, Maveric K I L Abella, Michael E Berkowitz, Monica Rouco Molina, Ivana Nikolić-Hughes, Emlyn W Hughes, Malvin A Ruderman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Background gamma radiation and soil activity measurements in the northern Marshall Islands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlisle E W ToppingK=1 Project, Center for Nuclear Studies, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Maveric K I L AbellaK=1 Project, Center for Nuclear Studies, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Michael E BerkowitzDepartment of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Monica Rouco MolinaK=1 Project, Center for Nuclear Studies, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Ivana Nikolić-HughesK=1 Project, Center for Nuclear Studies, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Emlyn W HughesK=1 Project, Center for Nuclear Studies, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; ewh42@columbia.edu mar@astro.columbia.edu.
Malvin A RudermanDepartment of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; ewh42@columbia.edu mar@astro.columbia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radioactive contamination of fruits in the northern Marshall Islands, resulting from the US nuclear weapons testing program in the 1940s and 1950s, is still a human health concern, in particular pertaining to island population resettlement and the economic benefit from farming. Over 200 fruits, primarily coconuts and pandanus, were collected on 11 islands from four atolls in the northern Marshall Islands in 2017. The energy spectra from nuclear gamma decays were measured on a research vessel for each fruit in situ. From these recordings, the level of cesium-137 (

Indexed as

Radiation MonitoringCesium RadioisotopesFruitMicronesiaRadioactive PollutantsReference StandardsCesium-137Cesium RadioisotopesRadioactive PollutantsBikinicesium-137foodMarshall Islandsradiation

Identifiers

PMID31308233
PMCPMC6681726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.