Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31308220›Full record

SynthesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Neural substrates of sexual arousal are not sex dependent.

Ekaterina Mitricheva, Rui Kimura, Nikos K Logothetis, Hamid R Noori

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. An Honest Reckoning With the Amygdala and Mental Illness.The American journal of psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. In Pursuit of Pleasure: A Biopsychosocial Perspective on Sexual Pleasure and Gender.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2021
    Article
  15. Neural substrates of sexual arousal revisited: Dependent on sex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Reply to Poeppl et al.: Controlling for false positive rates is critical for accurate and consistent interpretation of findings.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ekaterina MitrichevaDepartment of Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Rui KimuraDepartment of Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Nikos K LogothetisDepartment of Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; nikos.logothetis@tuebingen.mpg.de hamid.noori@tuebingen.mpg.de.
Hamid R NooriDepartment of Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; nikos.logothetis@tuebingen.mpg.de hamid.noori@tuebingen.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual arousal is a dynamical, highly coordinated neurophysiological process that is often induced by visual stimuli. Numerous studies have proposed that the cognitive processing stage of responding to sexual stimuli is the first stage, in which sex differences occur, and the divergence between men and women has been attributed to differences in the concerted activity of neural networks. The present comprehensive metaanalysis challenges this hypothesis and provides robust quantitative evidence that the neuronal circuitries activated by visual sexual stimuli are independent of biological sex. Sixty-one functional magnetic resonance imaging studies (1,850 individuals) that presented erotic visual stimuli to men and women of different sexual orientation were identified. Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation was used to conduct metaanalyses. Sensitivity and clustering analyses of averaged neuronal response patterns were performed to investigate robustness of the findings. In contrast to neutral stimuli, sexual pictures and videos induce significant activations in brain regions, including insula, middle occipital, anterior cingulate and fusiform gyrus, amygdala, striatum, pulvinar, and substantia nigra. Cluster analysis suggests stimulus type as the most, and biological sex as the least, predictor for classification. Contrast analysis further shows no significant sex-specific differences within groups. Systematic review of sex differences in gray matter volume of brain regions associated with sexual arousal (3,723 adults) did not show any causal relationship between structural features and functional response to visual sexual stimuli. The neural basis of sexual arousal in humans is associated with sexual orientation yet, contrary to the widely accepted view, is not different between women and men.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingSex CharacteristicsAdultAphrodisiacsArousalEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorAphrodisiacsmetaanalysisneuroimagingsex differencessexual arousal

Identifiers

PMID31308220
PMCPMC6681749
OpenAlexW2956978058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.