Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31307962›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology oncology2020

Efficacy of Surgery in the Primary Tumor Site for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: Analysis of an International, Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Database.

Marco Moschini, Evanguelos Xylinas, Stefania Zamboni, Agostino Mattei, Günter Niegisch, Evan Y Yu, Aristotelis Bamias, Neeraj Agarwal, Srikala S Sridhar, Cora N Sternberg and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European urology oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

Marco MoschiniKlinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland. Electronic address: marco.moschini87@gmail.com.
Evanguelos XylinasCochin Hospital, APHP, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Stefania ZamboniKlinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Agostino MatteiKlinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Günter NiegischDepartment of Urology, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Evan Y YuFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aristotelis BamiasNational & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Neeraj AgarwalHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake, UT, USA.
Srikala S SridharCancer Clinical Research Unit (CCRU), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Cora N SternbergWeill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Ulka N VaishampayanKarmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Jonathan E RosenbergMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Joaquim BellmuntPSMAR-IMIM Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Matthew D GalskyMount Sinai School of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Francesco MontorsiUrological Research Institute (URI), Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Andrea NecchiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
RISC Investigators
Luzerner Kantonsspital · CHCornell University · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITFred Hutch Cancer Center · USHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHôpital Cochin · FRHospital del Mar Research Institute · ESIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Utah · USVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL M STEMMER · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of local treatment on survival in advanced-stage patients has gained interest in several malignancies; however, limited data exist regarding urothelial carcinoma (UC).

objectiveTo test the impact of surgery of the primary tumor site on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in patients affected by metastatic UC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsIndividual patient-level data from a multicenter collaboration, including metastatic UC patients treated with first-line cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy administered between January 2006 and January 2011 from hospitals in the USA, Europe, Israel, and Canada. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess the effect of surgery on CSM and OM in patients affected by metastatic UC using 3-mo landmark analyses. Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of the number of metastasis sites involved and including only patients treated with surgery before the start of chemotherapy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 326 patients included in the study, 47 (14%) were treated with surgery of the primary tumor site. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 43 (33-45)mo. Of the patients treated with surgery, 28 (60%) were affected by a primary bladder cancer and 19 (40%) by a primary upper urinary tract tumor. On multivariable analyses, surgery was associated with a protective effect on CSM (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59, confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.98, p=0.04) and OM (HR: 0.45, CI: 0.37-0.99, p=0.04) compared with patients treated with chemotherapy only. Similar results were found considering patients only surgically treated before the start of chemotherapy. After stratifying according to the number of metastatic sites, surgery has an effect on survival in patients with only one metastatic site, while no survival benefit was observed in patients with two or more metastatic sites. The study is limited by its retrospective nature.

conclusionsWe found that surgery of the primary tumor site is associated with improved survival in patients with metastatic UC who received standard chemotherapy. This effect disappears in patients affected by two or more metastatic sites. Our results need to be validated in a high-quality prospective trial. PATIENT SUMMARY: In our multicenter, retrospective series, surgery in metastatic urothelial cancer patients improve survival compared with patients treated with chemotherapy only. This effect was evident in patients with limited disease extent, identified as one metastatic site.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellDatabases, FactualHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesBladder cancerLocal treatmentMetastaticRadical cystectomyUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID31307962
PMCPMC6954983
OpenAlexW2957715479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.