Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31307946›Full record

ReviewThe lancet. HIV2019

Long-acting or extended-release antiretroviral products for HIV treatment and prevention in infants, children, adolescents, and pregnant and breastfeeding women: knowledge gaps and research priorities.

Sharon Nachman, Claire L Townsend, Elaine J Abrams, Moherndren Archary, Edmund Capparelli, Polly Clayden, Shahin Lockman, Patrick Jean-Philippe, Kenneth Mayer, Mark Mirochnick and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The lancet. HIV, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The LEAP Process: Streamlining the Development of Long-Acting Products and Formulations for Infectious Diseases.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sharon NachmanHealth Sciences Center, SUNY Stony Brook, Pediatrics, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: sharon.nachman@stonybrook.edu.
Claire L TownsendJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Elaine J AbramsICAP at Columbia, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Moherndren ArcharyUniversity of Kwa Zulu Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Edmund CapparelliSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Polly ClaydenHIV i-Base, London, UK.
Shahin LockmanBotswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Patrick Jean-PhilippeMaternal Adolescent Pediatric Research Branch, DAIDS/NIAID/NIH, Rockville, MD, USA.
Kenneth MayerSchool of Medicine, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mark MirochnickBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Jane McKenzie-WhiteJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kimberly StrubleFood and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Heather WattsOffice of the Global AIDS Coordinator and Health Diplomacy, Washington, DC, USA.
Charles FlexnerJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

LC - IMPAACT Leadership GroupUM1AI106716 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Grace M Aldrovandi · 2014 to 2026
$47.2M
The Long-Acting/Extended Release Antiretroviral Resource Program (LEAP)R24AI118397 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Charles W. Flexner · 2015 to 2026
$9.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R24 AI118397NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106716NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201800001CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201800001I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiretroviral agents with long-acting properties have potential to improve treatment outcomes substantially for people living with HIV. In November 2017, the Long acting/Extended Release Antiretroviral Resource Program (LEAP) convened a workshop with the aim of shaping the research agenda and promoting early development of long-acting or extended release products for key populations: pregnant and lactating women, children aged up to 10 years, and adolescents aged 10-19 years. Goals included strategies and principles to ensure that the needs of children, adolescents, and pregnant and lactating women are considered when developing long-acting formulations. Research should focus not only on how best to transition long-acting products to these populations, but also on early engagement across sectors and among stakeholders. A parallel rather than sequential approach is needed when establishing adult, adolescent, and paediatric clinical trials and seeking regulatory approval. Pregnant and lactating women should be included in adult clinical trials. Adolescent-friendly trial design is needed to improve recruitment and retention of young people.

Indexed as

Anti-Retroviral AgentsHIV InfectionsResearchAdolescentBreast FeedingChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials as TopicDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetention in CareYoung AdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsDelayed-Action Preparations

Identifiers

PMID31307946
PMCPMC7152795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.