Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31307510›Full record

SynthesisJournal of ovarian research2019

Proactive use of PROMs in ovarian cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Anette Stolberg Kargo, Angela Coulter, Pernille Tine Jensen, Karina Dahl Steffensen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of ovarian research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Ovarian cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to personalise follow-up care of ovarian cancer: what do patients think? A qualitative interview study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anette Stolberg KargoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Sygehus Lillebalt, Vejle Sygehus, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100, Vejle, Denmark. Anette.Stolberg.Kargo@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-8133
Angela CoulterInstitute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19, 3, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Pernille Tine JensenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Karina Dahl SteffensenDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Sygehus Lillebalt, Vejle Sygehus, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100, Vejle, Denmark.

Funding

Kræftens Bekæmpelse 00262120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) has increased during the past decade, and the focus on how to use them has resulted in a more proactive application. Studies have shown that proactive use of PROMs during treatment improves patient-clinician communication, leads to better symptom management and may prolong survival among advanced cancer patients. Ovarian cancer is a serious disease in which the majority of patients experience recurrence during the follow-up period and suffer from a number of severe symptoms from underlying disease. This systematic review was conducted to assess the evidence on the proactive use of PROMs as a dialogue tool during follow-up of ovarian cancer patients.

resultsThe following databases were searched for relevant literature; PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. The search was conducted in April 2019 without any filters or limits. A total of 643 publications were identified, and 48 studies were found to be potentially eligible. Of the 48 papers, none met the final inclusion criterion of using PROMs proactively as a dialogue tool for ovarian cancer patients during follow-up.

conclusionStudies have shown that PROMs can identify otherwise undetected symptoms. Using PROMs proactively during the consultation has been shown to improve symptom management for patients with some other types of cancer. However, we found no studies that had examined the proactive use of PROMs during follow-up of ovarian cancer patients. Future studies should evaluate if the proactive use of PROMs could facilitate a more individualized and more effective follow-up program tailored to the ovarian cancer patient's needs and preferences.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresCancer SurvivorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansOvarian NeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesFollow-upOvarian cancerPatient reported outcomeQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID31307510
PMCPMC6631969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.