Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31307505›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Impact of PReOperative Midazolam on OuTcome of Elderly patients (I-PROMOTE): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Ana Kowark, Rolf Rossaint, András P Keszei, Petra Bischoff, Michael Czaplik, Berthold Drexler, Peter Kienbaum, Moritz Kretzschmar, Christopher Rex, Thomas Saller and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03052660 (Impact of Preoperative Midazolam on Outcome of Elderly Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03052660 phase4completednot on this map

Impact of Preoperative Midazolam on Outcome of Elderly Patients: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRWTH Aachen UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled782ConditionsPreanesthetic MedicationArmsMidazolam, Placebo oral capsule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Perioperative anxiety and fear of death].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ana KowarkDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7433-8675
Rolf RossaintDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
András P KeszeiCenter for Translational & Clinical Research Aachen (CTC-A), Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Petra BischoffDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care, Pain and Palliative Care, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Michael CzaplikDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Berthold DrexlerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Peter KienbaumDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Moritz KretzschmarDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christopher RexDepartment for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy and Palliative Care, Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Thomas SallerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gerhard SchneiderDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Martin SoehleDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Mark CoburnDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. mcoburn@ukaachen.de.
I-PROMOTE study group
RWTH Aachen University · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DELMU Klinikum · DEUniversitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEKreiskliniken Reutlingen · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPremedication of surgical patients with benzodiazepines has become questionable regarding risk-benefit ratio and lack of evidence. Though preoperative benzodiazepines might alleviate preoperative anxiety, a higher risk for adverse events is described, particularly for elderly patients (≥ 65 years). Several German hospitals already withhold benzodiazepine premedication from elderly patients, though evidence for this approach is lacking. The patient-centred outcome known as global postoperative patient satisfaction is recognised as a substantial quality indicator of anaesthesia care incorporated by the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Therefore, we aim to assess whether the postoperative patient satisfaction after premedication with placebo compared to the preoperative administration of 3.75 mg midazolam in elderly patients differs.

methodsThis study is a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, two-arm parallel, interventional trial, conducted in nine German hospitals. In total 614 patients (≥ 65-80 years of age) undergoing elective surgery with general anaesthesia will be randomised to receive either 3.75 mg midazolam or placebo. The primary outcome (global patient satisfaction) will be assessed with the validated EVAN-G questionnaire on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes will be assessed until the first postoperative day and then 30 days after surgery. They comprise among other things: functional and cognitive recovery, postoperative delirium, health-related quality of life assessment, and mortality or new onset of serious cardiac or pulmonary complications, acute stroke, or acute kidney injury. Analysis will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcome will be analysed with the use of mixed linear models including treatment effect and study centre as factors and random effects for blocks. Exploratory adjusted and subgroup analyses of the primary and secondary outcomes with regard to gender effects, frailty, pre-operative anxiety level, patient demographics, and surgery experience will also be performed. DISCUSSION: This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first study analysing patient satisfaction after premedication with midazolam in elderly patients. In conclusion, this study will provide high-quality data for the decision-making process regarding premedication in elderly surgical patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03052660 . Registered on 14 February 2017. EudraCT 2016-004555-79 .

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsClinical Decision-MakingDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGermanyHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMidazolamMulticenter Studies as TopicPremedicationPreoperative CareHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamGeneral anaesthesiaMidazolamPatient satisfactionPlaceboPremedication

Identifiers

PMID31307505
PMCPMC6632125
OpenAlexW2961051633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.