Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31307491›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2019

Needs-based planning for the oral health workforce - development and application of a simulation model.

Susan Ahern, Noel Woods, Olivier Kalmus, Stephen Birch, Stefan Listl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Oral Health in America: Implications for dental practice.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Workforce Planning Models for Oral Health Care: A Scoping Review.JDR clinical and translational research · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan AhernOral Health Services Research Centre, Cork University Dental School & Hospital, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. susan.ahern@ucc.ie.ORCID 0000-0001-6534-0506
Noel WoodsCentre for Policy Studies, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Olivier KalmusSection for Translational Health Economics, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stephen BirchCentre for the Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Stefan ListlSection for Translational Health Economics, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

European Commission's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program 635183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization's global strategy on human resources for health includes an objective to align investment in human resources for health with the current and future needs of the population. Although oral health is a key indicator of overall health and wellbeing, and oral diseases are the most common noncommunicable diseases affecting half the world's population, oral health workforce planning efforts have been limited to simplistic target dentist-population or constant services-population ratios which do not account for levels of and changes in population need. Against this backdrop, our aim was to develop and operationalise an oral health needs-based workforce planning simulation tool.

methodsUsing a conceptual framework put forward in the literature, we aimed to build the model in Microsoft Excel and apply it in a hypothetical context to demonstrate its operability. The model incorporates a provider supply component and a provider requirement component, enabling a comparison of the current and future supply of and requirement for oral health workers. Publicly available data, including the Special Eurobarometer 330 Oral Health Survey, were used to populate the model. Assumptions were made where data were not publicly available and key assumptions were tested in scenario analyses.

resultsWe have systematically developed a needs-based workforce planning model for the oral health workforce and applied the model in a hypothetical context over a 30-year time span. In the 2017 baseline scenario, the model produced a full-time equivalent (FTE) provider requirement figure of 899 dentists compared with an FTE provider supply figure of 1985. In the scenario analyses, the FTE provider requirement figure ranged from 1123 to 1629 illustrating the extent of the impact of changing parameter values.

conclusionsIn response to policy makers' recognition of the pressing need to better plan human resources for health and the scarcity of work in this area for dentistry, we have demonstrated the feasibility of producing a workable, practical and useful needs-based workforce planning simulation tool for the oral health workforce. In doing so, we have highlighted the challenges faced in accessing timely and relevant data needed to populate such models and ensure the reliability of model outputs.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandHealth WorkforceModels, TheoreticalNeeds AssessmentOral HealthDental AssistantsDental HygienistsDental TechniciansDentistsGlobal HealthHealth PlanningHumansWorld Health OrganizationNeeds-basedOral healthProvider requirementProvider supplyWorkforce planning

Identifiers

PMID31307491
PMCPMC6632192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.