Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31307436›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Structural modelling of wellbeing for Indigenous Australians: importance of mental health.

Rosalie Schultz, Stephen Quinn, Byron Wilson, Tammy Abbott, Sheree Cairney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Smudging the barriers away: crafting theInternational journal of circumpolar health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rosalie SchultzCentre for Remote Health, Flinders University, PO Box 4066, Alice Springs, NT, 0871, Australia. Rosalie.Schultz@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6985-749X
Stephen QuinnDepartment of Statistics, Data Science and Epidemiology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Byron WilsonMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Tammy AbbottNinti One Ltd, Cooperative Research Centre for Remote Economic Participation, Alice Springs, NT, Australia.
Sheree CairneyCentre for Remote Health, Flinders University, PO Box 4066, Alice Springs, NT, 0871, Australia.
Flinders University · AUCentre for Remote Health · AUCharles Darwin University · AUSwinburne University of Technology · AU

Funding

Cooperative Research Centre for Remote Economic Participation NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAustralia provides health care services for Indigenous peoples as part of its effort to enhance Indigenous peoples' wellbeing. However, biomedical frameworks shape Australia's health care system, often without reference to Indigenous wellbeing priorities. Under Indigenous leadership the Interplay research project explored wellbeing for Indigenous Australians in remote regions, through defining and quantifying Indigenous people's values and priorities. This article aimed to quantify relationships between health care access, mental and physical health, and wellbeing to guide services to enhance wellbeing for Indigenous Australians in remote regions.

methodsIndigenous and non-Indigenous researchers worked with Indigenous people in remote Australia to create a framework of wellbeing priorities. Indigenous community priorities were community, culture and empowerment; these interplay with government priorities for Indigenous development of health, education and employment. The wellbeing framework was further explored in four Indigenous communities through a survey which measured aspects of the wellbeing priorities. Indigenous community researchers administered the survey in their home communities to 841 Indigenous people aged 15 to 34 years from June 2014. From the survey items, exploratory factor analysis was used to develop constructs for mental and physical health, barriers to health care access and wellbeing. Relationships between these constructs were quantified through structural equation modelling.

resultsParticipants reported high levels of health and physical health (mean scores (3.17/4 [SD 0.96]; and 3.76/4 [SD 0.73]) and wellbeing 8.07/10 [SD 1.94]. Transport and costs comprised the construct for barriers to health care access (mean access score 0.89/1 [SD 0.28]). Structural equation modelling showed that mental health, but not physical health was associated with wellbeing (β = 0.25, P < 0.001; β = - 0.038, P = 0.3). Health care access had an indirect positive relationship with wellbeing through mental health (β = 0.047, P = 0.007). Relationships differed significantly for participants in remote compared with those in very remote communities.

conclusionsGreater attention to mental health and recognition of the role of services outside the health care sector may have positive impacts on wellbeing for Indigenous people in remote/ very remote Australia. Aggregation of remote and very remote populations may obscure important differences between Indigenous communities.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPersonal SatisfactionAdolescentAdultAustraliaFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services, IndigenousHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAboriginal AustraliansARIAFunctional healthHealth care accessIndigenous AustraliansMental healthPhysical healthRemotenessStructural equation modellingWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID31307436
PMCPMC6631670
OpenAlexW2959785758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.