Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31307419›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Incidence of catastrophic expenditures linked to obstetric and neonatal care at 92 facilities in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2015.

Abel Mukengeshayi Ntambue, Françoise Kaj Malonga, Karen D Cowgill, Michèle Dramaix-Wilmet, Philippe Donnen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Abel Mukengeshayi NtambueUnité d'Epidémiologie et de Santé de la mère, du nouveau-né et de l'enfant, École de Santé Publique, Université de Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo. abelntambue@yahoo.fr.
Françoise Kaj MalongaUnité d'Epidémiologie et de Santé de la mère, du nouveau-né et de l'enfant, École de Santé Publique, Université de Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Karen D CowgillSchool of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, USA.
Michèle Dramaix-WilmetCentre de recherche en Epidémiologie, Biostatistiques et recherche clinique, École de Santé Publique Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Philippe DonnenCentre de recherche en Epidémiologie, Biostatistiques et recherche clinique, École de Santé Publique Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Lubumbashi · CDUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

ARES,Belgium ARES-CCD-BOURSES-JN-MA-MAA-59
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), more than 93% of users must pay out of pocket for care. Despite the risk of catastrophic expenditures (CE), 94% of births in Lubumbashi are attended by skilled personnel. We aimed to identify risk factors for CE associated with obstetric and neonatal care in this setting, to document coping mechanisms employed by households to pay the price of care, and to identify consequences of CE on households.

methodsWe used mixed methods and conducted both a cross-sectional study and a phenomenological study of women who delivered at 92 health care facilities in all 11 health zones of Lubumbashi. In April and May 2015 we followed 1,627 women and collected data on their health care and household expenses to determine whether they experienced CE, defined as payments that reached or exceeded 40% of a household's capacity to pay. Two months after discharge, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 58 women at their homes to assess the consequences of CE.

resultsIn all, 261 of 1,627 (16.0%) women experienced CE. Whether a woman or her infant experienced complications was an important contributor to her risk of CE; poverty, younger age, being unmarried, and delivering in a parastatal facility or with more highly trained personnel also increased risk. Among a subset of women with CE interviewed 2 months after discharge, those who were in debt or who had lost their trading income or goods were unable to pay their rent, their children's school fees, or were obliged to reduce food consumption in the household; some had become victims of mistreatment such as verbal abuse, disputes with in-laws, denial of paternity, abandonment by partners, financial deprivation, even divorce.

conclusionsWe found a higher proportion of CE than previously reported in the DRC or in other urban settings in Africa. We suggest that the government and funders in DRC support initiatives to put in place mutual-aid health risk pools and health insurance and introduce and institutionalize free maternal and infant care. We further suggest that the government ensure decent and regular payment of providers and improve the financing and functioning of health care facilities to improve the quality of care and alleviate the burden on users.

Indexed as

AdultCatastrophic IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleHealth ExpendituresHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant CareInfant, NewbornPregnancyRisk FactorsYoung AdultDemocratic Republic of the CongoExpenditures, healthObstetric labor complications

Identifiers

PMID31307419
PMCPMC6632186
OpenAlexW2957257522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.