Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31307417›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Women's perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study.

Annalise Weckesser, Nicola Farmer, Rinita Dam, Amie Wilson, Victoria Hodgetts Morton, R Katie Morris

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05856097 (Effects of Kinesio Taping With and Without Diaphragmatic Breathing on Incisional Pain and Mobility in Women After Cesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05856097 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Kinesio Taping With and Without Diaphragmatic Breathing on Incisional Pain and Mobility in Women After Cesarean Section

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled36ConditionsCesarean Section ComplicationsArmskinesio taping with diaphragmatic breathing, kinesio taping without diaphragmatic breathing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Annalise WeckesserCentre for Social Care, Health and Related Research, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B15 3TN, UK.
Nicola FarmerBirmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, B152TG, UK.
Rinita DamCentre for Social Care, Health and Related Research, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B15 3TN, UK.
Amie WilsonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK.
Victoria Hodgetts MortonBirmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, B152TG, UK. V.A.H.Morton@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9817-4313
R Katie MorrisBirmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, B152TG, UK.
Birmingham Women's Hospital · GBBirmingham City University · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1215-20013Research for Patient Benefit Programme 1215-20013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn England, 27.8% of all pregnant women undergo caesarean sections (CS) to deliver their babies. Women undergoing CS are at risk of developing sepsis and post-natal infections, which not only contribute significantly to maternal mortality and morbidity, but also negatively impact upon post-natal recovery and wellbeing. This study explores patients' priorities in relation to CS recovery, focusing on their knowledge and experiences of infection prevention. The study formed part of the PREPS (Vaginal Preparation at caesarean section to Reduce Endometritis and Prevent Sepsis - a feasibility study of chlorhexidine) Trial; patients' views on the PREPS Trial were also sought.

methodsUsing qualitative methodology, two focus groups and six telephone interviews were carried out between September and October 2017 with a total of 21 women who had undergone a CS within the preceding six months. Focus groups and individual telephone interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim; a thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 11.

resultsWomen's priorities around CS recovery centred on pain (or the lack thereof), mobility and the ability to resume everyday activities, including caregiving. Those undergoing a CS for the first time reported not feeling confident in their ability to identify signs of infection and sought visiting health professionals' expertise and reassurance. Women were unable to recall whether they had received information regarding infection prevention and felt that they had not received sufficient advice. Some reported receiving general information regarding CS recovery, which ranged in quality. Prevention of womb infection is a major goal of the PREPS trial, however, the majority of women were not aware that womb (as opposed to wound) infection was a post CS risk.

conclusionsWomen undergoing a CS want more information on what constitutes a 'normal' post-operative recovery and specifically would welcome written information and infection prevention advice. This should be a key element of improving post-CS maternal experiences and potentially reducing sepsis and infection rates. CS stigma negatively impacts women's recovery experiences and possibly information provision. The PREPS team incorporated findings regarding consent pathways for recruiting women into intrapartum research and developed two patient reported outcomes to collect in the main trial.

trial registrationThe PREPS trial has been registered with ISRCTN on the 10th July 2017 ( ISRCTN33435996 ).

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionClinical Trials as TopicEndometritisEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHumansPilot ProjectsPostoperative PeriodPostpartum PeriodPregnancyQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaYoung AdultCaesarean sectionCaesarean section recoveryPatient experiencePostnatal infectionQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID31307417
PMCPMC6631540
OpenAlexW2806291674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.