Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31307124›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2019

Clinical and biological characterization of skeletal muscle tissue biopsies of surgical cancer patients.

Ana Anoveros-Barrera, Amritpal S Bhullar, Cynthia Stretch, Nina Esfandiari, Abha R Dunichand-Hoedl, Karen J B Martins, David Bigam, Rachel G Khadaroo, Todd McMullen, Oliver F Bathe and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex Differences in Inflammation and Muscle Wasting in Aging and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Comprehensive comparison of the prognostic value of systemic inflammation biomarkers for cancer cachexia: a multicenter prospective study.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Anoveros-BarreraDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Amritpal S BhullarDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Cynthia StretchDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nina EsfandiariDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Abha R Dunichand-HoedlDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Karen J B MartinsDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
David BigamDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Rachel G KhadarooDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Todd McMullenDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Oliver F BatheDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sambasivarao DamarajuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Richard J SkipworthClinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Charles T PutmanFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Vickie E BaracosDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Vera C MazurakDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7724-6354
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearchers increasingly use intraoperative muscle biopsy to investigate mechanisms of skeletal muscle atrophy in patients with cancer. Muscles have been assessed for morphological, cellular, and biochemical features. The aim of this study was to conduct a state-of-the-science review of this literature and, secondly, to evaluate clinical and biological variation in biopsies of rectus abdominis (RA) muscle from a cohort of patients with malignancies.

methodsLiterature was searched for reports on muscle biopsies from patients with a cancer diagnosis. Quality of reports and risk of bias were assessed. Data abstracted included patient characteristics and diagnoses, sample size, tissue collection and biobanking procedures, and results. A cohort of cancer patients (n = 190, 88% gastrointestinal malignancies), who underwent open abdominal surgery as part of their clinical care, consented to RA biopsy from the site of incision. Computed tomography (CT) scans were used to quantify total abdominal muscle and RA cross-sectional areas and radiodensity. Biopsies were assessed for muscle fibre area (μm

resultsMuscle biopsy occurred in 59 studies (total N = 1585 participants). RA was biopsied intraoperatively in 40 studies (67%), followed by quadriceps (26%; percutaneous biopsy) and other muscles (7%). Cancer site and stage, % of male participants, and age were highly variable between studies. Details regarding patient medical history and biopsy procedures were frequently absent. Lack of description of the population(s) sampled and low sample size contributed to low quality and risk of bias. Weight-losing cases were compared with weight stable cancer or healthy controls without considering a measure of muscle mass in 21 out of 44 studies. In the cohort of patients providing biopsy for this study, 78% of patients had preoperative CT scans and a high proportion (64%) met published criteria for sarcopenia. Fibre type distribution in RA was type I (46% ± 13), hybrid type I/IIA (1% ± 1), type IIA (36% ± 10), hybrid type IIA/D (15% ± 14), and type IID (2% ± 5). Sexual dimorphism was prominent in RA CT cross-sectional area, mean fibre cross-sectional area, and in expression of genes associated with muscle growth, apoptosis, and inflammation (P < 0.05). Medical history revealed multiple co-morbid conditions and medications.

conclusionsContinued collaboration between researchers and cancer surgeons enables a more complete understanding of mechanisms of cancer-associated muscle atrophy. Standardization of biobanking practices, tissue manipulation, patient characterization, and classification will enhance the consistency, reliability, and comparability of future studies.

Indexed as

BiopsyFemaleHumansMaleMuscular AtrophyNeoplasmsRectus AbdominisResearch DesignSex CharacteristicsTomography, X-Ray ComputedWeight LossBiopsyCancerRectus abdominisSarcopeniaSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID31307124
PMCPMC9536086
OpenAlexW2959526451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.