Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31307020›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020

Magnetic resonance electrical property mapping at 21.1 T: a study of conductivity and permittivity in phantoms, ex vivo tissue and in vivo ischemia.

Ghoncheh Amouzandeh, Frederic Mentink-Vigier, Shannon Helsper, F Andrew Bagdasarian, Jens T Rosenberg, Samuel C Grant

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Brain Tissue Conductivity in Focal Cerebral Ischemia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ghoncheh AmouzandehDepartment of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9423-7003
Frederic Mentink-VigierThe National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3570-9787
Shannon HelsperThe National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.
F Andrew BagdasarianThe National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.
Jens T RosenbergThe National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.
Samuel C GrantThe National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7738-168X
Florida State University · US

Funding

MR Analysis of Pre-Conditioned Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Stroke TherapyR01NS102395 · NINDS · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GRANT, SAMUEL COLLES · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical properties (EP), namely conductivity and permittivity, can provide endogenous contrast for tissue characterization. Using electrical property tomography (EPT), maps of EP can be generated from conventional MRI data. This report investigates the feasibility and accuracy of EPT at 21.1 T for multiple RF coils and modes of operation using phantoms. Additionally, it demonstrates the EP of the in vivo rat brain with and without ischemia. Helmholtz-based EPT was implemented in its Full-form, which demands the complex [Formula: see text] field, and a simplified form requiring either just the [Formula: see text] field phase for conductivity or the [Formula: see text] field magnitude for permittivity. Experiments were conducted at 21.1 T using birdcage and saddle coils operated in linear or quadrature transceive mode, respectively. EPT approaches were evaluated using a phantom, ex and in vivo Sprague-Dawley rats under naïve conditions and ischemic stroke via transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Different conductivity reconstruction approaches applied to the phantom displayed average errors of 12%-73% to the target acquired from dielectric probe measurements. Permittivity reconstructions showed higher agreement and an average 3%-8% error to the target depending on reconstruction approach. Conductivity and permittivity of ex and in vivo rodent brain were measured. Elevated EP in the ischemia region correlated with the increased sodium content and the influx of water intracellularly following ischemia in the lesion were detected. The Full-form technique generated from the linear birdcage provided the best accuracy for EP of the phantom. Phase-based conductivity and magnitude-based permittivity mapping provided reasonable estimates but also demonstrated the limitations of Helmholtz-based EPT at 21.1 T. Permittivity reconstruction was improved significantly over lower fields, suggesting a novel metric for in vivo brain studies. EPT applied to ischemic rat brain proved sensitivity to physiological changes, motivating the future application of more advanced reconstruction approaches.

Indexed as

Electric ConductivityAlgorithmsAnimalsBrain IschemiaImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID31307020
PMCPMC7223161
OpenAlexW2956915198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.