Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31306884›Full record

ArticleInfant behavior & development2019

Spontaneous visual search during the first two years: Improvement with age but no evidence of efficient search.

Emily J Goldknopf, Kristen Gillespie-Lynch, Adrian D Marroquín, Bryan D Nguyen, Scott P Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infant behavior & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily J GoldknopfDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States. Electronic address: e.goldknopf@ucla.edu.
Kristen Gillespie-LynchDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States; Department of Psychology/Human Development Training Area, College of Staten Island/The Graduate Center of the CUNY, NY, United States.
Adrian D MarroquínDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Bryan D NguyenDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Scott P JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.

Funding

Origins of Object KnowledgeR01HD040432 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JOHNSON, SCOTT P · 2002 to 2010
$1.8M
Constraints on Visual Statistical Learning in InfancyR01HD073535 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JOHNSON, SCOTT P · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD040432NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient visual search, wherein reaction times to acquire targets are largely independent of array size, is commonly observed in adults. Evidence for efficient search in infants may imply that selective attention to visual features is similar across development. In the current cross-sectional eye-tracking study, we examined spontaneous visual search at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Infants were presented with Random arrays (one target among 7, 13, or 26 pseudorandomly distributed elements) and Circle arrays (one target among 4, 7, or 13 elements arranged in a circle). Contrary to predictions, we did not find evidence of efficient search among infants. With increasing array size, time-to-target increased, the proportion of targets fixated (analogous to accuracy) decreased, and the proportion of first looks to the target decreased for both types of array (ps < .001). For Random arrays, the proportion of first looks to the target was similar to chance for all ages and array sizes; for Circle arrays, it exceeded chance for some ages and array sizes. The proportion of targets fixated and first looks to target increased with age across display types (ps < .05). We also tested adults with the same stimuli under similar conditions; the adults showed evidence of efficient visual search. Possible explanations and implications are discussed.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsAttentionChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationReaction TimeVisual PerceptionDevelopmentInfancyVisual attentionVisual search

Identifiers

PMID31306884
PMCPMC6875622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.