Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31306505›Full record

ReviewYeast (Chichester, England)2019

The many types of heterogeneity in replicative senescence.

Zhou Xu, Maria Teresa Teixeira

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yeast (Chichester, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. N6-Methyladenosine Methylation of mRNA in Cell Senescence.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Telomere Replication: Solving Multiple End Replication Problems.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhou XuCNRS, UMR7238, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine, Laboratory of Computational and Quantitative Biology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9468-1406
Maria Teresa TeixeiraCNRS, UMR8226, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Laboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology of Eukaryotes, Sorbonne Université, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9466-7951
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-11-LABX-0011-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-16-CE12-0026Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-17-CE20-0002-01Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale équipe labellisée
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replicative senescence, which is induced by telomere shortening, underlies the loss of regeneration capacity of organs and is ultimately detrimental to the organism. At the same time, it is required to protect organisms from unlimited cell proliferation that may arise from numerous stimuli or deregulations. One important feature of replicative senescence is its high level of heterogeneity and asynchrony, which promote genome instability and senescence escape. Characterizing this heterogeneity and investigating its sources are thus critical to understanding the robustness of replicative senescence. Here we review the different aspects of senescence driven by telomere attrition that are subject to variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the current understanding of the molecular processes at play, and the consequences of heterogeneity in replicative senescence.

Indexed as

Genomic InstabilityTelomere ShorteningCellular SenescenceDNA DamageGenes, cdcHumansSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA damage checkpointheterogeneityreplicative senescencetelomerasetelomere

Identifiers

PMID31306505
PMCPMC6900063
OpenAlexW2961518656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.