SynthesisPloS one2019
Intrauterine contraceptive device training and outcomes for healthcare providers in developed countries: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bladder Stone Secondary to Migration of an Intrauterine Device: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- The Magnitude and Factors for Early Discontinuation of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Use Among Clients at Marie Stopes Maternal and Child Health Center, Adama, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Intrauterine device management by nurses in Primary Health Care.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Challenges in Providing Gynecological Procedures in Primary Care: A Survey of Canadian Academic Family Physicians.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- The Thematic Analysis of Barriers to Immediate Post-Partum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evidence of intrauterine device insertion by nurses in Primary Health Care: an integrative review.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2024Review
- Barriers to and Facilitators of Contraceptive Implant Training in New Jersey Family Medicine Residencies: A Qualitative Study.Family medicine · 2023Article
- Knowledge, beliefs and practices of nurses with long-acting reversible contraception, Cape Town.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of training primary care internal medicine residents in etonogestrel implants and impact on their future practice: A cross-sectional study.Contraception · 2022Article
- Immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device utilization and influencing factors in Addis Ababa public hospitals: a cross-sectional study.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2021Article
- The Role of Video-Assisted E-Learning in Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion Training.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) are a safe and cost-effective contraceptive method for medically eligible women. Despite this, the utilisation rate for IUCDs is relatively low in many high-income countries, including Australia. Provision of education and training regarding IUCDs to healthcare providers, including nurses and midwives, is one approach to overcome some of the barriers that may prevent wider uptake of IUCDs. This study aims to explore the types and impact of IUCD insertion training for healthcare providers. A systematic review was undertaken in January 2017 to determine the effectiveness of IUCD training for healthcare providers in relation to provision of IUCDs to women. The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, COCHRANE and SCOPUS were searched to identify studies from high-income countries relating to IUCD training for healthcare providers and relevant outcomes. A total of 30 studies were included in the review. IUCD training for healthcare providers contributed to increased knowledge and improved positive attitudes towards IUCDs, high rates of successful insertions, low complication rates, and increased provision of IUCDs. Successful insertions and low complication rates were similar across different healthcare provider types. No notable differences between provider types in terms of knowledge increase or insertion outcomes were observed. Different training programs for healthcare providers were found to be effective in improving knowledge and successful provision of IUCDs. Increasing the number of healthcare providers skilled in IUCD insertions in high-income countries, including nurses and midwives, will enhance access to this method of contraception and allow women greater contraceptive choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.