Observational studyPLoS medicine2019
A simple real-time model for predicting acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients in the US: A descriptive modeling study.
Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Characterization of Risk Prediction Models for Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Flow Cytometry and AI-Driven Biomarker Discovery in Acute Kidney Injury: From Mechanistic Insights to Translation Applications in Clinical and Austere Environments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Acute Kidney Injury Risk Classification.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025Article
- Enhancing predictive accuracy for urinary tract infections post-pediatric pyeloplasty with explainable AI: an ensemble TabNet approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a real-time prediction model for acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Omicron surge impact on acute kidney injury in ICU patients: A study using the ISARIC COVID-19 database.PloS one · 2025Observational
- Machine Learning for Predicting Chronic Renal Disease Progression in COVID-19 Patients with Acute Renal Injury: A Feasibility Study.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Internal and External Validation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury Following Non-Cardiac Surgery Using Open Datasets.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Conceptually Funded Usability Evaluation of an Application for Leveraging Descriptive Data Analysis Models for Cardiovascular Research.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Study and Directions for Future Research.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Prediction differences and implications of acute kidney injury with and without urine output criteria in adult critically ill patients.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2023Article
- Prediction of Mortality and Major Adverse Kidney Events in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2023Article
- Dynamic prediction of life-threatening events for patients in intensive care unit.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled decision support in nephrology.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022Review
- Characterizing the temporal changes in association between modifiable risk factors and acute kidney injury with multi-view analysis.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Alerting to acute kidney injury - Challenges, benefits, and strategies.Practical laboratory medicine · 2022Article
- A Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury in Adult Patients With Minimal Change Disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Does Artificial Intelligence Make Clinical Decision Better? A Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Kidney Injury Prediction.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Use of Deep Learning to Predict Acute Kidney Injury After Intravenous Contrast Media Administration: Prediction Model Development Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is an adverse event that carries significant morbidity. Given that interventions after AKI occurrence have poor performance, there is substantial interest in prediction of AKI prior to its diagnosis. However, integration of real-time prognostic modeling into the electronic health record (EHR) has been challenging, as complex models increase the risk of error and complicate deployment. Our goal in this study was to create an implementable predictive model to accurately predict AKI in hospitalized patients and could be easily integrated within an existing EHR system. METHODS AND
findingsWe performed a retrospective analysis looking at data of 169,859 hospitalized adults admitted to one of three study hospitals in the United States (in New Haven and Bridgeport, Connecticut) from December 2012 to February 2016. Demographics, medical comorbidities, hospital procedures, medications, and laboratory data were used to develop a model to predict AKI within 24 hours of a given observation. Outcomes of AKI severity, requirement for renal replacement therapy, and mortality were also measured and predicted. Models were trained using discrete-time logistic regression in a subset of Hospital 1, internally validated in the remainder of Hospital 1, and externally validated in Hospital 2 and Hospital 3. Model performance was assessed via the area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The training set cohort contained 60,701 patients, and the internal validation set contained 30,599 patients. External validation data sets contained 43,534 and 35,025 patients. Patients in the overall cohort were generally older (median age ranging from 61 to 68 across hospitals); 44%-49% were male, 16%-20% were black, and 23%-29% were admitted to surgical wards. In the training set and external validation set, 19.1% and 18.9% of patients, respectively, developed AKI. The full model, including all covariates, had good ability to predict imminent AKI for the validation set, sustained AKI, dialysis, and death with AUCs of 0.74 (95% CI 0.73-0.74), 0.77 (95% CI 0.76-0.78), 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.85), and 0.69 (95% CI 0.67-0.72), respectively. A simple model using only readily available, time-updated laboratory values had very similar predictive performance to the complete model. The main limitation of this study is that it is observational in nature; thus, we are unable to conclude a causal relationship between covariates and AKI and do not provide an optimal treatment strategy for those predicted to develop AKI.
conclusionsIn this study, we observed that a simple model using readily available laboratory data could be developed to predict imminent AKI with good discrimination. This model may lend itself well to integration into the EHR without sacrificing the performance seen in more complex models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.