Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31306408›Full record

Observational studyPLoS medicine2019

A simple real-time model for predicting acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients in the US: A descriptive modeling study.

Michael Simonov, Ugochukwu Ugwuowo, Erica Moreira, Yu Yamamoto, Aditya Biswas, Melissa Martin, Jeffrey Testani, F Perry Wilson

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Prediction differences and implications of acute kidney injury with and without urine output criteria in adult critically ill patients.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2023
    Article
  13. Prediction of Mortality and Major Adverse Kidney Events in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael SimonovProgram of Applied Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8032-1119
Ugochukwu UgwuowoProgram of Applied Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2453-4272
Erica MoreiraJoint Data Analytics Team, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Yu YamamotoProgram of Applied Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8323-8676
Aditya BiswasProgram of Applied Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-3553
Melissa MartinProgram of Applied Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6575-1855
Jeffrey TestaniSection of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
F Perry WilsonProgram of Applied Translational Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2633-2412

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Renal Physiology and Phenotyping CoreP30DK079310 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ARONSON, PETER S. · 2008 to 2022
$16.8M
Mechanism and Effects of Manipulating Chloride Homeostasis in Heart FailureR01HL139629 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY M TESTANI · 2018 to 2026
$5.0M
Diagnosing and Targeting Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance in Heart FailureR01HL128973 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TESTANI, JEFFREY M · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
Optimizing Electronic Alerts for Acute Kidney InjuryR01DK113191 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, FRANCIS PERRY · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128973NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139629NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079310NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK113191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is an adverse event that carries significant morbidity. Given that interventions after AKI occurrence have poor performance, there is substantial interest in prediction of AKI prior to its diagnosis. However, integration of real-time prognostic modeling into the electronic health record (EHR) has been challenging, as complex models increase the risk of error and complicate deployment. Our goal in this study was to create an implementable predictive model to accurately predict AKI in hospitalized patients and could be easily integrated within an existing EHR system. METHODS AND

findingsWe performed a retrospective analysis looking at data of 169,859 hospitalized adults admitted to one of three study hospitals in the United States (in New Haven and Bridgeport, Connecticut) from December 2012 to February 2016. Demographics, medical comorbidities, hospital procedures, medications, and laboratory data were used to develop a model to predict AKI within 24 hours of a given observation. Outcomes of AKI severity, requirement for renal replacement therapy, and mortality were also measured and predicted. Models were trained using discrete-time logistic regression in a subset of Hospital 1, internally validated in the remainder of Hospital 1, and externally validated in Hospital 2 and Hospital 3. Model performance was assessed via the area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The training set cohort contained 60,701 patients, and the internal validation set contained 30,599 patients. External validation data sets contained 43,534 and 35,025 patients. Patients in the overall cohort were generally older (median age ranging from 61 to 68 across hospitals); 44%-49% were male, 16%-20% were black, and 23%-29% were admitted to surgical wards. In the training set and external validation set, 19.1% and 18.9% of patients, respectively, developed AKI. The full model, including all covariates, had good ability to predict imminent AKI for the validation set, sustained AKI, dialysis, and death with AUCs of 0.74 (95% CI 0.73-0.74), 0.77 (95% CI 0.76-0.78), 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.85), and 0.69 (95% CI 0.67-0.72), respectively. A simple model using only readily available, time-updated laboratory values had very similar predictive performance to the complete model. The main limitation of this study is that it is observational in nature; thus, we are unable to conclude a causal relationship between covariates and AKI and do not provide an optimal treatment strategy for those predicted to develop AKI.

conclusionsIn this study, we observed that a simple model using readily available laboratory data could be developed to predict imminent AKI with good discrimination. This model may lend itself well to integration into the EHR without sacrificing the performance seen in more complex models.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesInpatientsAcute Kidney InjuryAgedAged, 80 and overConnecticutElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRenal Dialysis

Identifiers

PMID31306408
PMCPMC6629054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.