Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31306246›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychiatry2019

Neuroimaging and eating disorders.

Guido K W Frank

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Childhood maltreatment is associated with cortical thinning in people with eating disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): III. Emotional dysfunction superspectrum.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Effects of an Adenosine AFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guido K W FrankEating Disorders Center for Treatment and Research, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING GRANTT32HD041697 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI RESTREPO, DIEGO · 2001 to 2015
$2.4M
Taste reward circuits and prediction error define eating disorder psychopathologyR01MH103436 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STODDARD, JOEL JOHNSON · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Brain Reward Circuits and Computational Modeling in Adolescent Anorexia NervosaR01MH096777 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FRANK, GUIDO KW · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD041697NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096777NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewEating disorders are severe psychiatric disorders with a suspected complex biopsychosocial cause. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the recent literature on brain imaging in eating disorders. RECENT

findingsFood restriction as well as binge eating and purging behaviors are associated with lower regional brain volumes or cortical thickness, but those changes largely return to normal with normalization of weight and eating behavior. Computational modeling has started to identify patterns of structural and functional imaging data that classify eating disorder subtypes, which could be used in the future, diagnostically and to better understand disorder-specific psychopathology. The prediction error model, a computational approach to assess dopamine-related brain reward function, helped support a brain-based model for anorexia nervosa. In that model, the conscious motivation to restrict conflicts with body signals that stimulate eating. This conflict causes anxiety and drives a vicious cycle of food restriction. SUMMARY: Novel brain research supports the notion that eating disorders have distinct neurobiological underpinnings. This new knowledge can be used to describe disease models to patients and develop novel treatments.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingBrainComputational BiologyDopamineFeeding and Eating DisordersFeeding BehaviorHumansMotivationNeurobiologyRewardDopamine

Identifiers

PMID31306246
PMCPMC6768759
OpenAlexW2956962995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.