Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31306173›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2019

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic evaluation of contraceptive implants and antiretroviral therapy among women in Kenya and Uganda.

Rena C Patel, Randy M Stalter, Katherine K Thomas, Bani Tamraz, Steven W Blue, David W Erikson, Christina J Kim, Edward J Kelly, Kavita Nanda, Athena P Kourtis and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Rena C PatelaDepartment of Medicine bDepartment of Global Health cDepartment of Epidemiology dDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington eDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California fEndocrine Technologies Core, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon gGlobal Health, Population, and Nutrition, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina hDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA iCenter for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya jDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Randy M Stalter
Katherine K Thomas
Bani Tamraz
Steven W Blue
David W Erikson
Christina J Kim
Edward J Kelly
Kavita Nanda
Athena P Kourtis
Jairam R Lingappa
Nelly Mugo
Jared M Baeten
Kimberly K Scarsi
Partners PrEP Study Team
Oregon National Primate Research Center · USUniversity of Washington · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USFamily Health International 360 · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
Validation, CLIA and Qualification (VQC): Enhancing the RS ratio as a tool for AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) tuberculosis trialsUM1AI106701 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Grace M Aldrovandi · 2014 to 2026
$116.8M
University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EDWIN ROBERTO ORELLANA · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Pharmacological Strategies to use the Levonorgestrel Implant in HIV-infected WomenR01HD085887 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCARSI, KIMBERLY K. · 2015 to 2020
$1.4M
Investigating interactions between efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy and contraceptive implantsK23AI120855 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PATEL, RENA CHIMAN · 2015 to 2019
$850k
Hormonal contraception, pre-exposure prophylaxis, and HIV-1 protectionR21HD074439 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAETEN, JARED · 2013 to 2014
$432k
A pharmacokinetic evaluation of new first-line antiretroviral therapy regimens and contraceptive implants among HIV-positive women in KenyaR21AI136645 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PATEL, RENA CHIMAN · 2018 to 2019
$422k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005013NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI120855NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI136645NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106701NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD085887NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD074439NIH HHS P51 OD011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of contraceptive implant progestin concentrations in HIV-positive women initiating efavirenz (EFV)-containing or nevirapine (NVP)-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART).

designWe analyzed stored samples from women self-reporting implant use in the Partners PrEP Study.

methodsPlasma samples collected every 6 months were analyzed for levonorgestrel and etonogestrel concentrations. Progestin concentrations from samples collected after ART initiation were compared with pre-ART concentrations for intraindividual comparisons. We used adjusted linear mixed models to compare hormone concentrations between individuals on EFV and NVP to a no ART group. We then evaluated whether possessing certain alleles with known or possible influences on EFV, NVP, or progestin metabolism were associated with changes in progestin concentrations or modified the association between ART use and progestin concentrations.

resultsOur analysis included 11 women who initiated EFV, 13 who initiated NVP, and 36 who remained ART-naive. In the EFV group, the adjusted geometric mean ratio (aGMR) of levonorgestrel was 0.39 [90% confidence intervals (0.31, 0.49); P < 0.001] and the etonogestrel aGMR was 0.51 (0.34, 0.76; P = 0.006) compared with the control group. No difference was observed in the NVP group compared with controls [levonorgestrel 0.93 (0.74, 1.18); P = 0.64; etonogestrel 1.07 (0.77, 1.50); P = 0.73]. Possession of four allele variants were found to result in further reductions in progestin concentrations among those receiving EFV.

conclusionConcomitant use of EFV significantly reduces levonorgestrel or etonogestrel concentrations by 61 and 49%, respectively, compared with no ART use. We also report allelic variants in hepatic enzymes that influenced the extent of the observed drug-interaction between progestins and EFV.

Indexed as

Drug AntagonismAdultAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesContraceptive Agents, FemaleCyclopropanesDesogestrelFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaLevonorgestrelLinear ModelsNevirapinePharmacogenomic TestingAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesContraceptive Agents, FemaleCyclopropanesDesogestrelefavirenzetonogestrelLevonorgestrelNevirapine

Identifiers

PMID31306173
PMCPMC6774811
OpenAlexW2959611509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.