Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31306141›Full record

ArticleJournal of Parkinson's disease2019

The Qualification of an Enrichment Biomarker for Clinical Trials Targeting Early Stages of Parkinson's Disease.

Diane Stephenson, Derek Hill, Jesse M Cedarbaum, Maria Tome, Spiros Vamvakas, Klaus Romero, Daniela J Conrado, David T Dexter, John Seibyl, Danna Jennings and 15 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Simplified quantification of [Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Do caffeine and more selective adenosine AParkinsonism & related disorders · 2020
    Review
  14. Approaches to Disease Modification for Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Trials and Lessons Learned.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Diane StephensonCritical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Derek HillUniversity College London, UK.
Jesse M CedarbaumBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Maria TomeEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Spiros VamvakasEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Klaus RomeroCritical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Daniela J ConradoCritical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.
David T DexterParkinson's UK, London, UK.
John SeibylInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA.
Danna JenningsDenali Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Timothy NicholasPfizer, Groton, CT, USA.
Dawn MatthewsADM Diagnostics, Northbrook, IL, USA.
Zhiyong XiePfizer, Groton, CT, USA.
Syed ImamU.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR, USA.
Paul MaguireUCB, Brussels, Belgium.
David RussellInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA.
Mark Forrest GordonCPP Scientific Advisor, PA, USA.
Glenn T StebbinsRush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ed SomerGE Healthcare, London, UK.
Jill GallagherParkinson's UK, London, UK.
Arthur RoachParkinson's UK, London, UK.
Peter BassechesMerck & Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Donald GrossetUniversity of Glasgow, Scotland.
Kenneth MarekInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA.
Critical Path for Parkinson’s Consortium

Funding

Critical Path to Public Private PartnershipsU18FD005320 · FDA · CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE · PI Klaus Romero · 2014 to 2026
$127.1M
FDA HHS U18 FD005320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As therapeutic trials target early stages of Parkinson's disease (PD), appropriate patient selection based purely on clinical criteria poses significant challenges. Members of the Critical Path for Parkinson's Consortium formally submitted documentation to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) supporting the use of Dopamine Transporter (DAT) neuroimaging in early PD. Regulatory documents included a comprehensive literature review, a proposed analysis plan of both observational and clinical trial data, and an assessment of biomarker reproducibility and reliability. The research plan included longitudinal analysis of the Parkinson Research Examination of CEP-1347 Trial (PRECEPT) and the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) study to estimate the degree of enrichment achieved and impact on future trials in subjects with early motor PD. The presence of reduced striatal DAT binding based on visual reads of single photon emission tomography (SPECT) scans in early motor PD subjects was an independent predictor of faster decline in UPDRS Parts II and III as compared to subjects with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD) over 24 months. The EMA issued in 2018 a full Qualification Opinion for the use of DAT as an enrichment biomarker in PD trials targeting subjects with early motor symptoms. Exclusion of SWEDD subjects in future clinical trials targeting early motor PD subjects aims to enrich clinical trial populations with idiopathic PD patients, improve statistical power, and exclude subjects who are unlikely to progress clinically from being exposed to novel test therapeutics.

Indexed as

BiomarkersClinical Studies as TopicClinical Trials as TopicCorpus StriatumDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsHumansObservational Studies as TopicParkinson DiseaseSocieties, MedicalTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonBiomarkersDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsDopamine transporterEMAenrichment biomarkerPPMIPRECEPTSWEDD

Identifiers

PMID31306141
PMCPMC6700608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.