Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31305921›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

Cohort selection for clinical trials using hierarchical neural network.

Ying Xiong, Xue Shi, Shuai Chen, Dehuan Jiang, Buzhou Tang, Xiaolong Wang, Qingcai Chen, Jun Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Artificial intelligence for optimizing recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. LeafAI: query generator for clinical cohort discovery rivaling a human programmer.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  7. Machine learning approaches for electronic health records phenotyping: a methodical review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Primary care perspectives on implementation of clinical trial recruitment.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Cohort selection for clinical trials: n2c2 2018 shared task track 1.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ying XiongDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Xue ShiDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Shuai ChenDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Dehuan JiangDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Buzhou TangDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaolong WangDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Qingcai ChenDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Jun YanYidu Cloud (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.

Funding

National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2): Challenges in Natural Language Processing for Clinical NarrativesR13LM013127 · NLM · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI UZUNER, OZLEM · 2019 to 2023
$100k
Challenges in Natural Language Processing in Clinical TextR13LM011411 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI UZUNER, OZLEM · 2012 to 2016
$98k
NLM NIH HHS R13 LM011411NLM NIH HHS R13 LM013127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCohort selection for clinical trials is a key step for clinical research. We proposed a hierarchical neural network to determine whether a patient satisfied selection criteria or not. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe designed a hierarchical neural network (denoted as CNN-Highway-LSTM or LSTM-Highway-LSTM) for the track 1 of the national natural language processing (NLP) clinical challenge (n2c2) on cohort selection for clinical trials in 2018. The neural network is composed of 5 components: (1) sentence representation using convolutional neural network (CNN) or long short-term memory (LSTM) network; (2) a highway network to adjust information flow; (3) a self-attention neural network to reweight sentences; (4) document representation using LSTM, which takes sentence representations in chronological order as input; (5) a fully connected neural network to determine whether each criterion is met or not. We compared the proposed method with its variants, including the methods only using the first component to represent documents directly and the fully connected neural network for classification (denoted as CNN-only or LSTM-only) and the methods without using the highway network (denoted as CNN-LSTM or LSTM-LSTM). The performance of all methods was measured by micro-averaged precision, recall, and F1 score.

resultsThe micro-averaged F1 scores of CNN-only, LSTM-only, CNN-LSTM, LSTM-LSTM, CNN-Highway-LSTM, and LSTM-Highway-LSTM were 85.24%, 84.25%, 87.27%, 88.68%, 88.48%, and 90.21%, respectively. The highest micro-averaged F1 score is higher than our submitted 1 of 88.55%, which is 1 of the top-ranked results in the challenge. The results indicate that the proposed method is effective for cohort selection for clinical trials. DISCUSSION: Although the proposed method achieved promising results, some mistakes were caused by word ambiguity, negation, number analysis and incomplete dictionary. Moreover, imbalanced data was another challenge that needs to be tackled in the future.

conclusionIn this article, we proposed a hierarchical neural network for cohort selection. Experimental results show that this method is good at selecting cohort.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPatient SelectionClinical Trials as TopicData MiningElectronic Data ProcessingElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine LearningMental HealthNatural Language Processingclassificationclinical trialscohort selectionhierarchical neural networkmental health records

Identifiers

PMID31305921
PMCPMC7647215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.