ArticleNPJ digital medicine2018
Erratum: Author Correction: Impact of remote patient monitoring on clinical outcomes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing Primary Care Physicians' Intent to Refer Patients With Hypertension to a Digital Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Program: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Promise of Remote Patient Monitoring.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024Article
- Embroidered Interdigitated Electrodes (IDTs) with Wireless Readout for Continuous Biomarker Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exploring the Constituent Elements of a Successful Mobile Health Intervention for Prediabetic Patients in King Saud University Medical City Hospitals in Saudi Arabia: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Towards Responsible Implementation of Monitoring Technologies in Institutional Care.The Gerontologist · 2020Article
- Perceptions of Patients Regarding Mobile Health Interventions for the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/s41746-017-0002-4.].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.