Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31305349›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2019

The utilization of complementary and alternative medicine in Taiwan: An internet survey using an adapted version of the international questionnaire (I-CAM-Q).

Ching-Wen Huang, Diem Ngoc Hong Tran, Tsai-Feng Li, Yui Sasaki, Ju Ah Lee, Myeong Soo Lee, Ichiro Arai, Yoshiharu Motoo, Keiko Yukawa, Kiichiro Tsutani and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Ching-Wen HuangDepartment of Science in Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Diem Ngoc Hong TranInstitute of Traditional Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Tsai-Feng LiInstitute of Traditional Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yui SasakiDepartment of Applied Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Ju Ah LeeHwa-pyeong Institute of Integrative Medicine, Incheon, South Korea.
Myeong Soo LeeClinical Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea.
Ichiro AraiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nihon Pharmaceutical University, Saitama, Japan.
Yoshiharu MotooDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Keiko YukawaDepartment of Health Policy and Technology Assessment, National Institute of Public Health, Saitama, Japan.
Kiichiro TsutaniFaculty of Health Sciences, Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
Seong-Gyu KoDepartment of Science in Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Shinn-Jang HwangDepartment of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Fang-Pey ChenInstitute of Traditional Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Kyung Hee University · KRNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWKanazawa Medical University · JPKorea Institute of Oriental Medicine · KRNational Institute of Public Health · JPNihon Pharmaceutical University · JPTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TWTokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Taiwan, numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). However, most of them focused on specific diseases or the use of particular methods. Therefore, the results of those studies were quite different and difficult to compare with those of studies from other countries. The International CAM Questionnaire (I-CAM-Q), meanwhile, is a unified tool that can provide comparable results for studies conducted worldwide. Thus, the aim of this study was to discover the proportions of people in Taiwan receiving CAM treatments from different types of health care providers by using an adapted version of I-CAM-Q (I-CAM-QT).

methodsI-CAM-QT was developed by translating the Korean version of I-CAM-Q (I-CAM-QK) into traditional Chinese language because of the similarity of CAM usage and doctor licensing system. This study had two stages: the first was a pretest survey used to adjust the questionnaire, while the second was an internet-based survey used to collect data from the community.

resultsOf the 1200 survey respondents, 37% and 37.7% were prescribed or advised to use Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) by Western medicine (WM) physicians and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) doctors, respectively. Other than CHM, dietary supplements and massage were the forms of CAM most commonly prescribed or recommended by WM physicians or TCM doctors. Overall, walking and relaxation techniques were the most commonly used self-help practices (used by 61.9% and 40.4% of the respondents, respectively). Additionally, 70.3% of the respondents had used at least one kind of dietary supplement in the past 12 months.

conclusionRegarding the utilization of CAM in Taiwan, this internet-based survey revealed that CHM, dietary supplements, and massage were the types of CAM most commonly prescribed or recommended by WM physicians or TCM doctors.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SupplementsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInternetMaleMedicine, Chinese TraditionalMiddle AgedTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID31305349
PMCPMC13048053
OpenAlexW2957966197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.