Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31304866›Full record

ReviewThe Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry2020

Regions and Connections: Complementary Approaches to Characterize Brain Organization and Function.

Corey Horien, Abigail S Greene, R Todd Constable, Dustin Scheinost

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Context-dependent amygdala-prefrontal connectivity during the dot-probe task varies by irritability and attention bias to angry faces.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Corey HorienInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6738-1029
Abigail S GreeneInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
R Todd ConstableInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Dustin ScheinostDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007205 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KAZMIERCZAK, BARBARA I · 1985 to 2019
$42.9M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001864 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$9.9M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001864NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging has proved to be a powerful tool to characterize spatiotemporal patterns of human brain activity. Analysis methods broadly fall into two camps: those summarizing properties of a region and those measuring interactions among regions. Here we pose an unappreciated question in the field: What are the strengths and limitations of each approach to study fundamental neural processes? We explore the relative utility of region- and connection-based measures in the context of three topics of interest: neurobiological relevance, brain-behavior relationships, and individual differences in brain organization. In each section, we offer illustrative examples. We hope that this discussion offers a novel and useful framework to support efforts to better understand the macroscale functional organization of the brain and how it relates to behavior.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainConnectomeHumansNerve NetNeural PathwaysconnectomicsfMRIfunctional magnetic resonance imagingintegrationpredictive modelingsegregation

Identifiers

PMID31304866
PMCPMC7079335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.