Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31304400›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2019

By the numbers: ratings and utilization of behavioral health mobile applications.

Andrew D Carlo, Reza Hosseini Ghomi, Brenna N Renn, Patricia A Areán

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew D Carlo1Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4349-9644
Reza Hosseini Ghomi2Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Brenna N Renn1Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8746-171X
Patricia A Areán1Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.

Funding

UW ALACRITY Center for Psychosocial Interventions ResearchP50MH115837 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI IAN Moore BENNETT · 2018 to 2026
$18.2M
Training Geriatric Mental Health Services ResearchersT32MH073553 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI BRUCE, MARTHA L · 2005 to 2019
$6.4M
UW Psychiatry Resident Research Education ProgramR25MH104159 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NEUMAIER, JOHN F · 2015 to 2019
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH115837NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH104159NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH073553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although >10,000 behavioral health applications ("apps") are currently available on the Apple and Google Play marketplaces, they have been minimally evaluated or regulated and little is known about "real world" usage patterns. This investigation combined data from online behavioral health app rating frameworks and a mobile health market research firm to identify the most downloaded apps as well as determine rating and ranking concordance between frameworks. Findings demonstrated that the most commonly downloaded apps focus on relaxation, mindfulness, and meditation skills and that they often have notably discordant reviews across rating frameworks. Our results suggest that there is a growing need for: (1) standardized behavioral health app quality and effectiveness measures, (2) up-to-date behavioral health app guidance for clinicians and consumers, and (3) evidence-based apps that incorporate revealed consumer preferences.

Indexed as

Health care economicsHealth policyHealth servicesPublic health

Identifiers

PMID31304400
PMCPMC6572775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.