ArticleNPJ digital medicine2019
High-dimensional detection of imaging response to treatment in multiple sclerosis.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning for multiple sclerosis classification and disability prediction using clinical and MRI data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- The Potential of Disease Progression Modeling to Advance Clinical Development and Decision Making.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- The role of AI for MRI-analysis in multiple sclerosis-A brief overview.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in MS clinical practice.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Review
- Spatial patterns of brain lesions assessed through covariance estimations of lesional voxels in multiple Sclerosis: The SPACE-MS technique.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Observational
- Non-invasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis from ultrasound imaging with machine learning.NPJ digital medicine · 2021Article
- Diverse Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2020Review
- Disrupted principal network organisation in multiple sclerosis relates to disability.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Changes on brain imaging may precede clinical manifestations or disclose disease progression opaque to conventional clinical measures. Where, as in multiple sclerosis, the pathological process has a complex anatomical distribution, such changes are not easily detected by low-dimensional models in common use. This hinders our ability to detect treatment effects, both in the management of individual patients and in interventional trials. Here we compared the ability of conventional models to detect an imaging response to treatment against high-dimensional models incorporating a wide multiplicity of imaging factors. We used fully-automated image analysis to extract 144 regional, longitudinal trajectories of pre- and post- treatment changes in brain volume and disconnection in a cohort of 124 natalizumab-treated patients. Low- and high-dimensional models of the relationship between treatment and the trajectories of change were built and evaluated with machine learning, quantifying performance with receiver operating characteristic curves. Simulations of randomised controlled trials enrolling varying numbers of patients were used to quantify the impact of dimensionality on statistical efficiency. Compared to existing methods, high-dimensional models were superior in treatment response detection (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.890 [95% CI = 0.885-0.895] vs. 0.686 [95% CI = 0.679-0.693],
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.