Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31304395›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2019

High-dimensional detection of imaging response to treatment in multiple sclerosis.

Baris Kanber, Parashkev Nachev, Frederik Barkhof, Alberto Calvi, Jorge Cardoso, Rosa Cortese, Ferran Prados, Carole H Sudre, Carmen Tur, Sebastien Ourselin and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Diverse Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Baris Kanber *1Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Parashkev Nachev *3National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), London, UK.
Frederik Barkhof1Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Alberto Calvi2Multiple Sclerosis Research Centre, NMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Jorge Cardoso1Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Rosa Cortese2Multiple Sclerosis Research Centre, NMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Ferran Prados1Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Carole H Sudre1Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Carmen Tur2Multiple Sclerosis Research Centre, NMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1849-3184
Sebastien Ourselin1Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Olga Ciccarelli2Multiple Sclerosis Research Centre, NMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-2017-08-ST2-004Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes on brain imaging may precede clinical manifestations or disclose disease progression opaque to conventional clinical measures. Where, as in multiple sclerosis, the pathological process has a complex anatomical distribution, such changes are not easily detected by low-dimensional models in common use. This hinders our ability to detect treatment effects, both in the management of individual patients and in interventional trials. Here we compared the ability of conventional models to detect an imaging response to treatment against high-dimensional models incorporating a wide multiplicity of imaging factors. We used fully-automated image analysis to extract 144 regional, longitudinal trajectories of pre- and post- treatment changes in brain volume and disconnection in a cohort of 124 natalizumab-treated patients. Low- and high-dimensional models of the relationship between treatment and the trajectories of change were built and evaluated with machine learning, quantifying performance with receiver operating characteristic curves. Simulations of randomised controlled trials enrolling varying numbers of patients were used to quantify the impact of dimensionality on statistical efficiency. Compared to existing methods, high-dimensional models were superior in treatment response detection (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.890 [95% CI = 0.885-0.895] vs. 0.686 [95% CI = 0.679-0.693],

Indexed as

Multiple sclerosisTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID31304395
PMCPMC6556513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.