Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31304391›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2019

Best practices for analyzing large-scale health data from wearables and smartphone apps.

Jennifer L Hicks, Tim Althoff, Rok Sosic, Peter Kuhar, Bojan Bostjancic, Abby C King, Jure Leskovec, Scott L Delp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer L Hicks1Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Tim Althoff2Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Rok Sosic3Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Peter KuharAzumio, Inc., Redwood City, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-8861
Bojan BostjancicAzumio, Inc., Redwood City, CA USA.
Abby C King5Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA.
Jure Leskovec3Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Scott L Delp1Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.

Funding

Trial of strategies to communicate genetic information to different ethnic and racial subpopulationsU54MD010724 · NIMHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MALDONADO, YVONNE A. · 2016 to 2021
$16.3M
Training CoreU54EB020405 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2014 to 2018
$11.6M
Tech-DevelopmentP2CHD065690 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2015 to 2019
$5.4M
Citizen Science to Promote Sustained Physical Activity in Low-Income CommunitiesR01CA211048 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KING, ABBY C · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Innovative Physical Activity Interventions for Overweight LatinosR01DK102016 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KING, ABBY C · 2014 to 2017
$2.7M
Stanford-Colombia Collaboratory-Planning UnitP20CA217199 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KING, ABBY C, ROSAS, LISA GOLDMAN · 2017 to 2018
$525k
NCI NIH HHS P20 CA217199NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211048NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020405NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065690NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK102016NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD010724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartphone apps and wearable devices for tracking physical activity and other health behaviors have become popular in recent years and provide a largely untapped source of data about health behaviors in the free-living environment. The data are large in scale, collected at low cost in the "wild", and often recorded in an automatic fashion, providing a powerful complement to traditional surveillance studies and controlled trials. These data are helping to reveal, for example, new insights about environmental and social influences on physical activity. The observational nature of the datasets and collection via commercial devices and apps pose challenges, however, including the potential for measurement, population, and/or selection bias, as well as missing data. In this article, we review insights gleaned from these datasets and propose best practices for addressing the limitations of large-scale data from apps and wearables. Our goal is to enable researchers to effectively harness the data from smartphone apps and wearable devices to better understand what drives physical activity and other health behaviors.

Indexed as

Data miningHealth sciencesStatistical methods

Identifiers

PMID31304391
PMCPMC6550237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.